Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Criteria for the evaluation of most scholars’ work have recently received wider attention due to high-profile cases of scientific misconduct which are perceived to be linked to these criteria. However, in the competition for career advancement and funding opportunities almost all scholars are subjected to the same criteria. Therefore these evaluation criteria act as ‘switchmen’, determining the tracks along which scholarly work is pushed by the dynamic interplay of interests of both scholars and their institutions. Currently one of the most important criteria is the impact of publications. In this research, the extent to which publish or perish, a long standing evaluation criterion, led to scientific misconduct is examined briefly. After this the strive for high impact publications will be examined, firstly by identifying the period in which this became an important evaluation criterion, secondly by looking at variables contributing to the impact of scholarly papers by means of a non-structured literature study, and lastly by combining these data into a quantitative analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-225
Number of pages27
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

Keywords

  • Publish or perish
  • High impact
  • Research evaluation
  • Publication practices

Cite this