Ethics in HTA: Examining the "Need for Expansion"

Payam Abrishami*, Wija Oortwijn, Bjorn Hofmann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The article by Daniels and colleagues on expanding the scope of health technology assessment (HTA) to embrace ethical analysis has received endorsement and criticism from commentators in this journal. Referring to this debate, we examine in this article the extent and locus of ethical analysis in HTA processes. An expansion/no-expansion framing of HTA is, in our view, not very fruitful. We argue that meaningfulness and relevance to the needs of the population are what should determine the extent of ethics in HTA. Once 'relevance' is the guiding principle, engaging in ethical analysis becomes inevitable as values are all over the place in HTA, also in how assessors frame research questions. We also challenge dividing the locus of ethical analysis into assessment and appraisal as this would detach HTA from its purpose, ie, supporting legitimate decision-making. Ethical analysis should therefore be considered integral to the HTA process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-553
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume6
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
  • Ethical Analysis
  • Organizational Decision-Making
  • Resource Allocation
  • HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT
  • EXPANDED HTA
  • ENHANCING FAIRNESS
  • LEGITIMACY

Cite this