End-to-end prognostication in colorectal cancer by deep learning: a retrospective, multicentre study

Xiaofeng Jiang, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Hannah Sophie Muti, Tanwei Yuan, Sebastian Foersch, Nicholas P. West, Alexander Brobeil, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Nicholas Hawkins, Robyn L. Ward, Titus J. Brinker, Oliver Lester Saldanha, Jia Ke, Wolfram Müller, Heike I. Grabsch, Philip Quirke, Daniel Truhn, Jakob Nikolas Kather*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Precise prognosis prediction in patients with colorectal cancer (ie, forecasting survival) is pivotal for individualised treatment and care. Histopathological tissue slides of colorectal cancer specimens contain rich prognostically relevant information. However, existing studies do not have multicentre external validation with real-world sample processing protocols, and algorithms are not yet widely used in clinical routine.Methods In this retrospective, multicentre study, we collected tissue samples from four groups of patients with resected colorectal cancer from Australia, Germany, and the USA. We developed and externally validated a deep learning-based prognostic-stratification system for automatic prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with resected colorectal cancer. We used the model-predicted risk scores to stratify patients into different risk groups and compared survival outcomes between these groups. Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic value of these risk groups after adjusting for established prognostic variables.Findings We trained and validated our model on a total of 4428 patients. We found that patients could be divided into high-risk and low-risk groups on the basis of the deep learning-based risk score. On the internal test set, the group with a high-risk score had a worse prognosis than the group with a low-risk score, as reflected by a hazard ratio (HR) of 4 center dot 50 (95% CI 3 center dot 33-6 center dot 09) for overall survival and 8 center dot 35 (5 center dot 06-13 center dot 78) for disease-specific survival (DSS). We found consistent performance across three large external test sets. In a test set of 1395 patients, the high-risk group had a lower DSS than the low-risk group, with an HR of 3 center dot 08 (2 center dot 44-3 center dot 89). In two additional test sets, the HRs for DSS were 2 center dot 23 (1 center dot 23-4 center dot 04) and 3 center dot 07 (1 center dot 78-5 center dot 3). We showed that the prognostic value of the deep learning-based risk score is independent of established clinical risk factors.Interpretation Our findings indicate that attention-based self-supervised deep learning can robustly offer a prognosis on clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer, generalising across different populations and serving as a potentially new prognostic tool in clinical decision making for colorectal cancer management. We release all source codes and trained models under an open-source licence, allowing other researchers to reuse and build upon our work. Funding The German Federal Ministry of Health, the Max-Eder-Programme of German Cancer Aid, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the German Academic Exchange Service, and the EU.Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e33-e43
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet Digital Health
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • PREDICTION
  • DIAGNOSIS

Cite this