Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review

D. T. Baird, S. Cameron, J. L. H. Evers, K. Gemzell-Danielsson, A. Glasier, C. Moreau, J. Trussell, H. von Hertzen, P. G. Crosignani*, C. La Vecchia, A. Volpe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

28 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Emergency contraception (EC) prevents pregnancy after unprotected sex or contraceptive failure. Use of EC has increased markedly in countries where a product is available over the counter, yet barriers to availability and use remain. Although effective in clinical trials, it has not yet been possible to show a public health benefit of EC in terms of reduction of unintended pregnancy rates. Selective progesterone receptor modulators developed as emergency contraceptives offer better effectiveness than levonorgestrel, but still EC is less effective than use of ongoing regular contraception. Methods which inhibit ovulation whenever they are taken or which act after ovulation to prevent implantation and strategies to increase the uptake of effective ongoing contraception after EC use would prevent more pregnancies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)751-760
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Keywords

  • contraception
  • emergency
  • review
  • effectiveness
  • future

Cite this