TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficient Standard Errors in Item Response Theory Models for Short Tests
AU - Ippel, Lianne
AU - Magis, David
N1 - Funding Information:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-0305 Ippel Lianne 1 Magis David 2 1 Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands 2 University of Liège, Liege, Belgium Lianne Ippel, Institute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Postbus 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, Netherlands. Email: [email protected] 10 2019 0013164419882072 © The Author(s) 2019 2019 SAGE Publications This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage ). In dichotomous item response theory (IRT) framework, the asymptotic standard error (ASE) is the most common statistic to evaluate the precision of various ability estimators. Easy-to-use ASE formulas are readily available; however, the accuracy of some of these formulas was recently questioned and new ASE formulas were derived from a general asymptotic theory framework. Furthermore, exact standard errors were suggested to better evaluate the precision of ability estimators, especially with short tests for which the asymptotic framework is invalid. Unfortunately, the accuracy of exact standard errors was assessed so far only in a very limiting setting. The purpose of this article is to perform a global comparison of exact versus (classical and new formulations of) asymptotic standard errors, for a wide range of usual IRT ability estimators, IRT models, and with short tests. Results indicate that exact standard errors globally outperform the ASE versions in terms of reduced bias and root mean square error, while the new ASE formulas are also globally less biased than their classical counterparts. Further discussion about the usefulness and practical computation of exact standard errors are outlined. item response theory ability estimation asymptotic standard error exact standard error Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002661 MIS F.4505.17 edited-state corrected-proof Authors’ Note David Magis is currently affiliated to IQVIA Belux. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the Incentive Grant for Scientific Research MIS F.4505.17 of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS, Belgium. ORCID iD Lianne Ippel https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-0305
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - In dichotomous item response theory (IRT) framework, the asymptotic standard error (ASE) is the most common statistic to evaluate the precision of various ability estimators. Easy-to-use ASE formulas are readily available; however, the accuracy of some of these formulas was recently questioned and new ASE formulas were derived from a general asymptotic theory framework. Furthermore, exact standard errors were suggested to better evaluate the precision of ability estimators, especially with short tests for which the asymptotic framework is invalid. Unfortunately, the accuracy of exact standard errors was assessed so far only in a very limiting setting. The purpose of this article is to perform a global comparison of exact versus (classical and new formulations of) asymptotic standard errors, for a wide range of usual IRT ability estimators, IRT models, and with short tests. Results indicate that exact standard errors globally outperform the ASE versions in terms of reduced bias and root mean square error, while the new ASE formulas are also globally less biased than their classical counterparts. Further discussion about the usefulness and practical computation of exact standard errors are outlined.
AB - In dichotomous item response theory (IRT) framework, the asymptotic standard error (ASE) is the most common statistic to evaluate the precision of various ability estimators. Easy-to-use ASE formulas are readily available; however, the accuracy of some of these formulas was recently questioned and new ASE formulas were derived from a general asymptotic theory framework. Furthermore, exact standard errors were suggested to better evaluate the precision of ability estimators, especially with short tests for which the asymptotic framework is invalid. Unfortunately, the accuracy of exact standard errors was assessed so far only in a very limiting setting. The purpose of this article is to perform a global comparison of exact versus (classical and new formulations of) asymptotic standard errors, for a wide range of usual IRT ability estimators, IRT models, and with short tests. Results indicate that exact standard errors globally outperform the ASE versions in terms of reduced bias and root mean square error, while the new ASE formulas are also globally less biased than their classical counterparts. Further discussion about the usefulness and practical computation of exact standard errors are outlined.
KW - item response theory
KW - exact standard error
KW - ability estimation
KW - asymptotic standard error
KW - MAXIMUM
KW - ESTIMATORS
KW - ABILITY
KW - LIKELIHOOD
UR - https://sage.figshare.com/articles/dataset/bib_Supplemental_material_for_Efficient_Standard_Errors_in_Item_Response_Theory_Models_for_Short_Tests/10006349/1
U2 - 10.1177/0013164419882072
DO - 10.1177/0013164419882072
M3 - Article
C2 - 32425215
SN - 0013-1644
VL - 80
SP - 461
EP - 475
JO - Educational and Psychological Measurement
JF - Educational and Psychological Measurement
IS - 3
M1 - 0013164419882072
ER -