ECPR for refractory OHCA - lessons from 3 randomized controlled trials. The trialists´view

Johannes F H Ubben, Samuel Heuts, Thijs S R Delnoij, Martje M Suverein, Anina F van de Koolwijk, Iwan C C van der Horst, Jos G Maessen, Jason Bartos, Petra Kavalkova, Daniel Rob, Demetris Yannopoulos, Jan Belohlávek*, Roberto Lorusso, Marcel C G van de Poll

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Three recent randomized trials (ARREST-trial, Prague OHCA study, and INCEPTION-trial) that addressed the clinical benefit of ECPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, yielded seemingly diverging results. The evidence for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, derived from three recent RCT's, is not contradictory but rather complementary. Excellent results can be achieved with a very high level of dedication, provided that strict selection criteria are applied. However, pragmatic implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not necessarily lead to improved outcome of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Centers that are performing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or aspire to do so, should critically evaluate whether they are able to meet the prerequisites that are needed to conduct an effective extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation program.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberzuad071
Pages (from-to)540-547
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • efficacy and effectiveness
  • randomized controlled trials
  • review

Cite this