Economic evaluation of nurse-led stroke aftercare addressing long-term psychosocial outcome: a comparison to care-as-usual

Daan P J Verberne, Ghislaine A P G van Mastrigt*, Rudolf W H M Ponds, Caroline M van Heugten, Mariëlle E A L Kroese

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Objective To examine the cost-effectiveness of nurse-led stroke aftercare addressing psychosocial outcome at 6 months post stroke, compared with care-as-usual. Design Economic evaluation within a comparative effectiveness research design. Setting Primary care (2016-2017) and community settings (2011-2013) in the Netherlands. Participants Persons who suffered from ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, or a transient ischaemic attack and were discharged home after visiting the emergency department, hospitalisation or inpatient rehabilitation. Interventions Nurse-led stroke aftercare at 6 months post stroke addressing psychosocial functioning by providing screening, psycho-education, emotional support and referral to specialist care when needed. Care-as-usual concerned routine follow-up care including secondary prevention programmes and a consultation with the neurologist at 6 weeks post stroke. Primary and secondary outcome measures Main outcome measure of cost-effectiveness was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated by the quality of life measured by the five-dimensional, three-level EuroQol. Costs were assessed using a cost-questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and social participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation) restrictions subscale. Results Health outcomes were significantly better in stroke aftercare for QALYs (Delta=0.05; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09) and social participation (Delta=4.91; 95% CI 1.89 to 7.93) compared with care-as-usual. Total societal costs were euro1208 higher in stroke aftercare than in care-as-usual (95% CI -euro3881 to euro6057). Healthcare costs were in total euro1208 higher in stroke aftercare than in care-as-usual (95% CI -euro3881 to euro6057). Average costs of stroke aftercare were euro91 (SD=euro3.20) per person. Base case cost-effectiveness analyses showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of euro24 679 per QALY gained. Probability of stroke aftercare being cost-effective was 64% on a euro50 000 willingness-to-pay level. Conclusions Nurse-led stroke aftercare addressing psychosocial functioning showed to be a low-cost intervention and is likely to be a cost-effective addition to care-as-usual. It plays an important role by screening and addressing psychosocial problem, not covered by usual care.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere039201
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalBMJ Open
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • health economics
  • health services administration &amp
  • management
  • primary care
  • stroke
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
  • FOCUSED FOLLOW-UP
  • BASE-LINE
  • TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK
  • HOSPITAL-CARE
  • TRIAL
  • CARDIAC-ARREST
  • REHABILITATION
  • HEALTH
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE

Cite this