Dutch judicial entrepreneurship towards legitimizing intellectual property rights

Krishnamani Jayaraman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In its recent judgment in the Sisvel v. Xiaomi case, the Court of Appeal of the Hague has demonstrated how European national legal systems and judiciary therein strive to uphold legitimacy of the intellectual property system. Involving dimensions of both substantive patent law and competition law, the case emphasized proportionality etched in European Union law to determine the legitimate cohesive balance for stakeholder economic interests in the protection, enforcement and use of intellectual property rights. This case note documents the salient features of the judgment and further comments on striking legal concepts that marked the case.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)684-694
Number of pages11
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • competition law and FRAND
  • Intellectual property law
  • legitimization
  • proportionality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dutch judicial entrepreneurship towards legitimizing intellectual property rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this