Abstract
In its recent judgment in the Sisvel v. Xiaomi case, the Court of Appeal of the Hague has demonstrated how European national legal systems and judiciary therein strive to uphold legitimacy of the intellectual property system. Involving dimensions of both substantive patent law and competition law, the case emphasized proportionality etched in European Union law to determine the legitimate cohesive balance for stakeholder economic interests in the protection, enforcement and use of intellectual property rights. This case note documents the salient features of the judgment and further comments on striking legal concepts that marked the case.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 684-694 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- competition law and FRAND
- Intellectual property law
- legitimization
- proportionality