Do Conspiracy Theories Shape or Rationalize Vaccination Hesitancy Over Time?

Jan-Willem van Prooijen*, Nienke Bohm

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Conspiracy beliefs are associated with vaccination hesitancy, which is commonly interpreted as evidence that conspiracy theories contribute to a worldview that damages public health. An alternative, and often ignored, explanation for this relationship is that people may rationalize their existing vaccination hesitancy through conspiracy theories. In two panel studies conducted at multiple time points during the vaccination campaign of 2021, we tested the temporal relationships between COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and vaccination intentions. Study 1 (three waves in a Dutch sample) provided evidence for temporal effects of conspiracy beliefs on vaccination hesitancy and of vaccination hesitancy on conspiracy beliefs. Study 2 (two waves in a U.S. sample), however, only supported an effect of vaccination hesitancy on conspiracy beliefs over time. Although these findings provide some support for the idea that conspiracy beliefs shape increased vaccination hesitancy, they more consistently support the alternative idea that vaccination hesitancy shapes increased conspiracy beliefs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-429
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date20 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • conspiracy beliefs
  • vaccination intentions
  • rationalization
  • cognitive dissonance
  • motivated reasoning

Cite this