TY - JOUR
T1 - Divergence and Convergence of the Public Health Leadership Competency Framework Against Others in Undergraduate Medical Education
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - Rodriguez-Feria, Pablo
AU - Czabanowska, Katarzyna
AU - Babich, Suzanne
AU - Rodriguez-Sanchez, Daniela
AU - Hernandez, Fredy Leonardo Carreno
AU - Florez, Luis Jorge Hernandez
PY - 2023/6/22
Y1 - 2023/6/22
N2 - Objective: The following scoping review is aimed at identifying leadership competency frameworks in Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) by analyzing the thematic scopes, target audiences, and methods involved. A further objective is to compare the frameworks against a standard framework.Methods: The authors extracted the thematic scope and methods of each framework based on the original author's formulations in each selected paper. The target audience was divided into three sections: UME, medical education, and beyond medical education. The frameworks were converged and diverged against the public health leadership competency framework.Results: Thirty-three frameworks covering thematic scopes such as refugees and migrants were identified. The most common methods to develop leadership frameworks were reviews and interviews. The courses targeted multiple disciplines including medicine and nurses. The identified competency frameworks have not converged among important domains of leadership such as systems thinking, political leadership, leading change, and emotional intelligence.Conclusion: There is a variety of frameworks that support leadership in UME. Nevertheless, they are not consistent in vital domains to face worldwide health challenges. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary leadership competency frameworks which address health challenges should be used in UME.
AB - Objective: The following scoping review is aimed at identifying leadership competency frameworks in Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) by analyzing the thematic scopes, target audiences, and methods involved. A further objective is to compare the frameworks against a standard framework.Methods: The authors extracted the thematic scope and methods of each framework based on the original author's formulations in each selected paper. The target audience was divided into three sections: UME, medical education, and beyond medical education. The frameworks were converged and diverged against the public health leadership competency framework.Results: Thirty-three frameworks covering thematic scopes such as refugees and migrants were identified. The most common methods to develop leadership frameworks were reviews and interviews. The courses targeted multiple disciplines including medicine and nurses. The identified competency frameworks have not converged among important domains of leadership such as systems thinking, political leadership, leading change, and emotional intelligence.Conclusion: There is a variety of frameworks that support leadership in UME. Nevertheless, they are not consistent in vital domains to face worldwide health challenges. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary leadership competency frameworks which address health challenges should be used in UME.
KW - undergraduate medical education
KW - leadership
KW - scoping review
KW - competency frameworks
KW - political leadership
KW - leading change
KW - emotional intelligence
KW - PREPARING STUDENTS
KW - CURRICULUM
KW - SYSTEMS
KW - FUTURE
U2 - 10.3389/phrs.2023.1605806
DO - 10.3389/phrs.2023.1605806
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
C2 - 37426906
SN - 2107-6952
VL - 44
JO - Public Health Reviews
JF - Public Health Reviews
IS - 1
M1 - 1605806
ER -