Disease activity-guided dose optimisation of adalimumab and etanercept is a cost-effective strategy compared with non-tapering tight control rheumatoid arthritis care: analyses of the DRESS study

Wietske Kievit*, Noortje van Herwaarden, Frank H. J. van den Hoogen, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Johannes W. J. Bijlsma, Bart J. F. van den Bemt, Aatke van der Maas, Alfons A. den Broeder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


A disease activity-guided dose optimisation strategy of adalimumab or etanercept (TNFi (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors)) has shown to be non-inferior in maintaining disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with usual care. However, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy is still unknown.This is a preplanned cost-effectiveness analysis of the Dose REduction Strategy of Subcutaneous TNF inhibitors (DRESS) study, a randomised controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial performed in two Dutch rheumatology outpatient clinics. Patients with low disease activity using TNF inhibitors were included. Total healthcare costs were measured and quality adjusted life years (QALY) were based on EQ5D utility scores. Decremental cost-effectiveness analyses were performed using bootstrap analyses; incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) was used to express cost-effectiveness.180 patients were included, and 121 were allocated to the dose optimisation strategy and 59 to control. The dose optimisation strategy resulted in a mean cost saving of -?12?280 (95 percentile -?10?502; -?14?104) per patient per 18?months. There is an 84% chance that the dose optimisation strategy results in a QALY loss with a mean QALY loss of -0.02 (-0.07 to 0.02). The decremental cost-effectiveness ratio (DCER) was ?390?493 (?5?085?184; dominant) of savings per QALY lost. The mean iNMB was ?10?467 (?6553-?14?037). Sensitivity analyses using 30% and 50% lower prices for TNFi remained cost-effective.Disease activity-guided dose optimisation of TNFi results in considerable cost savings while no relevant loss of quality of life was observed. When the minimal QALY loss is compensated with the upper limit of what society is willing to pay or accept in the Netherlands, the net savings are still high.NTR3216; Post-results.Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1939-1944
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016

Cite this