TY - JOUR
T1 - Discriminatory ability of simple OGTT-based beta cell function indices for prediction of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes
T2 - the CODAM study
AU - den Biggelaar, Louise J. C. J.
AU - Sep, Simone J. S.
AU - Eussen, Simone J. P. M.
AU - Mari, Andrea
AU - Ferrannini, Ele
AU - van Greevenbroek, Marleen M. J.
AU - van der Kallen, Carla J. H.
AU - Schalkwijk, Casper G.
AU - Stehouwer, Coen D. A.
AU - Dagnelie, Pieter C.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Aims/hypothesis The hyperglycaemic clamp technique and the frequently sampled IVGTT are unsuitable techniques to assess beta cell function (BCF) in large cohorts. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory ability of simple OGTT-based BCF indices for prediction of prediabetes (meaning impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) and type 2 diabetes.Methods Glucose metabolism status was assessed by 2 h 75 g OGTT at baseline (n = 476, mean age 59.2 years, 38.7% women) and after 7 years of follow-up (n = 416) in the Cohort on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CODAM) study (1999-2009). Baseline plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide values during OGTTs were used to calculate 21 simple indices of BCF. Disposition indices (BCF index x Matsuda index), to compensate for the prevailing level of insulin resistance, were calculated for the BCF indices with the best discriminatory abilities. The discriminatory ability of the BCF indices was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC AUC) with an outcome of incident prediabetes (n = 73) or type 2 diabetes (n = 60 and n = 18 cases, respectively, in individuals who were non-diabetic or had normal glucose metabolism at baseline).Results For incident prediabetes (n = 73), all ROC AUCs were less than 70%, whereas for incident type 2 diabetes, I-30/I-0, CP30/CP0, Delta I-30/Delta G(30), Delta CP30/Delta G(30) (where I, CP and G are the plasma concentrations of insulin, C-peptide and glucose, respectively, at the times indicated), and corrected insulin response at 30 min had ROC AUCs over 70%. In at-baseline non-diabetic individuals, disposition indices Delta I-30/Delta G(30), Delta CP30/Delta G(30) and corrected insulin response at 30 min had ROC AUCs of over 80% for incident type 2 diabetes. Moreover, these BCF disposition indices had significantly better discriminatory abilities for incident type 2 diabetes than the Matsuda index alone.Conculusion/interpretation BCF indices reflecting early-phase insulin secretion have the best ability to discriminate individuals who will develop prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. Of these, Delta CP30/Delta G(30), often referred to as the C-peptidogenic index, performed consistently well.
AB - Aims/hypothesis The hyperglycaemic clamp technique and the frequently sampled IVGTT are unsuitable techniques to assess beta cell function (BCF) in large cohorts. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory ability of simple OGTT-based BCF indices for prediction of prediabetes (meaning impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) and type 2 diabetes.Methods Glucose metabolism status was assessed by 2 h 75 g OGTT at baseline (n = 476, mean age 59.2 years, 38.7% women) and after 7 years of follow-up (n = 416) in the Cohort on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CODAM) study (1999-2009). Baseline plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide values during OGTTs were used to calculate 21 simple indices of BCF. Disposition indices (BCF index x Matsuda index), to compensate for the prevailing level of insulin resistance, were calculated for the BCF indices with the best discriminatory abilities. The discriminatory ability of the BCF indices was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC AUC) with an outcome of incident prediabetes (n = 73) or type 2 diabetes (n = 60 and n = 18 cases, respectively, in individuals who were non-diabetic or had normal glucose metabolism at baseline).Results For incident prediabetes (n = 73), all ROC AUCs were less than 70%, whereas for incident type 2 diabetes, I-30/I-0, CP30/CP0, Delta I-30/Delta G(30), Delta CP30/Delta G(30) (where I, CP and G are the plasma concentrations of insulin, C-peptide and glucose, respectively, at the times indicated), and corrected insulin response at 30 min had ROC AUCs over 70%. In at-baseline non-diabetic individuals, disposition indices Delta I-30/Delta G(30), Delta CP30/Delta G(30) and corrected insulin response at 30 min had ROC AUCs of over 80% for incident type 2 diabetes. Moreover, these BCF disposition indices had significantly better discriminatory abilities for incident type 2 diabetes than the Matsuda index alone.Conculusion/interpretation BCF indices reflecting early-phase insulin secretion have the best ability to discriminate individuals who will develop prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. Of these, Delta CP30/Delta G(30), often referred to as the C-peptidogenic index, performed consistently well.
KW - Beta cell function
KW - Discrimination
KW - Indices
KW - Insulin secretion
KW - OGTT
KW - Prediabetes
KW - Receiver operating
KW - characteristics
KW - Type 2 diabetesmellitus
KW - ORAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE
KW - HOMEOSTASIS MODEL ASSESSMENT
KW - INSULIN SENSITIVITY
KW - DISPOSITION INDEX
KW - RESISTANCE
KW - SECRETION
KW - PLASMA
KW - DYSFUNCTION
KW - ASSOCIATION
KW - RELEASE
U2 - 10.1007/s00125-016-4165-3
DO - 10.1007/s00125-016-4165-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 27933333
SN - 0012-186X
VL - 60
SP - 432
EP - 441
JO - Diabetologia
JF - Diabetologia
IS - 3
ER -