Deferring diagnostic evaluation for suspected deep venous thrombosis using a single dose of anticoagulant: Real-world data from a regionwide care pathway

Inge H.Y. Luu, Guy J.M. Mostard, Dominique van Mil, Marlon H.W. van Berlo, Marc B.I. Lobbes, Kemal Külcü, Hugo ten Cate, Jos Peeters, Jan Palmen, Jacqueline Buijs, Kon Siong G. Jie, Roel J.W. van Kampen, Daan J.L. van Twist*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are typically referred to the emergency department (ED) for immediate evaluation. However, this often contributes to ED overcrowding and necessitates round-the-clock sonographic examinations. Therefore, we implemented a regionwide care pathway for deferring diagnostic workup of suspected DVT until the following day. Patients receive a single anticoagulant dose from their general practitioner (GP) to prevent progression of DVT in the interval between referral and diagnostic evaluation. The next day, patients undergo comprehensive evaluation at our outpatient DVT clinic, including venous ultrasound. This retrospective study aims to provide real-world data on the safety of this care pathway regarding the occurrence of bleeding complications and pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: We included all GP-referred patients with suspected DVT in 2018 and 2019. Patients with absolute contraindications to deferred evaluation or anticoagulation were excluded. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of bleeding complications. Secondary endpoints included PE events and all-cause mortality within seven days following DVT evaluation. Results: Among 1,024 included patients, DVT was confirmed in 238 patients (23.2%) and superficial thrombophlebitis in 98 patients (9.6%). No bleeding events were recorded in patients in whom DVT was ruled out. PE was confirmed in eight patients on the same day as DVT evaluation (0.8%, 95%CI 0.4–1.6) and in six patients within seven days following DVT evaluation (0.6%, 0.2–1.3%). No deaths occurred during this timeframe. Conclusion: This real-world study observed a very low incidence of bleeding complications and PE events, indicating that this care pathway of deferred DVT workup is safe and may offer a more streamlined diagnostic approach for patients with suspected DVT.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-60
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean journal of internal medicine
Volume122
Early online date1 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Anticoagulation
  • Deep venous thrombosis
  • Diagnostic evaluation

Cite this