Cross-border differences in the prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial resistance in children attending daycare centers: a point prevalence study in the Netherlands and Belgium

Sara Dequeker*, Mitch van Hensbergen, Casper D J den Heijer, Wouter Dhaeze, Stijn F H Raven, Helen Ewalts-Hakkoer, Paulien Tolsma, Ina Willemsen, Karine J van Drunen-Kamp, Krista van der Slikke-Verstraten, Herman Goossens, Marjolein F Q Kluytmans-van den Bergh, Christian J P A Hoebe, i-4-1-Health Study Group, Lieke van Alphen, Casper den Heijer, Casper Jamin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Day care centres (DCCs) are ideal settings for drug-resistant bacteria to emerge. Prevalence numbers of faecal carriage of antimicrobial resistant bacteria in these settings are rare. We aimed to determine the prevalence of faecal antimicrobial resistant bacteria carriage in children attending DCCs and to assess and identify infection risk factors within DCCs in The Netherlands and Belgium. METHODS: A point-prevalence study was conducted in 28 Dutch (499 children) and 18 Belgian (448 children) DCCs. Stool samples were taken from the children's diapers and a questionnaire was filled in by their parents. Hygiene related to stool and toilet use, hygiene related to food, environmental contamination, hand hygiene and hygiene guidelines were assessed conform a standardized questionnaire by the infection prevention and control expert visiting the DCC. Multilevel logistical regression analyses were used to define which characteristics predicted the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacterales (CipR-E). RESULTS: The ESBL-E prevalence was 16% (n =?71) in Belgium and 6% (n =?30) in the Netherlands. The CipR-E prevalence was 17% (n =?78) in Belgium and 8% (n =?38) in the Netherlands. Antimicrobial use (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.33-0.48) and hospital admissions (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.25-0.54) were lower in the Netherlands. Children travelling to Asia were at higher risk of being an ESBL-E carrier. Children using antimicrobials were at higher risk of being a CipR-E carrier. Cleaning the changing mat after each use was found as a protective factor for CipR-E carriage. CONCLUSIONS: We established a significant difference in ESBL-E and CipR-E carriage and antimicrobial use and hospital admissions between the Netherlands and Belgium among children attending DCCs. The differences between both countries should be further studied to improve the policy on anti-microbial use and hospital admissions in children.
Original languageEnglish
Article number131
Number of pages12
JournalBMC Infectious Diseases
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Belgium
  • Children
  • CipR-E
  • Day care centres
  • ESBL-E
  • The Netherlands
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Belgium/epidemiology
  • Netherlands/epidemiology
  • Prevalence
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Risk Factors
  • Ciprofloxacin

Cite this