Corrigendum to Circular economy initiatives are no guarantee for increased plastic circularity: A framework for the systematic comparison of initiatives: A framework for the systematic comparison of initiatives

M. Lisiecki*, A. Damgaard, K. Ragaert, T. F. Astrup

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalErratum / corrigendum / retractionsAcademic

Abstract

The authors regret to inform you about a minor error that has been identified in Fig. 1, on the basis of an error in the Supplementary Materials. We discovered a lack of consistency in the rounding scoring of the third pillar (Long-term Circularity Contributions), corresponding to the size of the bubbles, for 8 of the 52 initiatives. In the Supplementary Materials, Table SM3 and Table SM4.2 have been corrected to be consistent. A corrected version of Fig. 1, which accurately represents the intended information and aligns with the article's content, has been made to rectify this error. The only change is the size of the bubble for the 8 updated initiatives. The changes performed do not affect the underlying discussion in the article. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original languageEnglish
Article number107169
JournalResources Conservation and Recycling
Volume201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to Circular economy initiatives are no guarantee for increased plastic circularity: A framework for the systematic comparison of initiatives: A framework for the systematic comparison of initiatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this