Abstract
We consider two neighbouring countries in which a pandemic disease spreads. Countries face a trade-off between the social costs of the epidemic diffusion and the monetary costs in order to avoid the insurgence of pandemics. However, due to migration of people across countries, the treatment efforts by one country generate a positive externality for the neighbouring country. Both countries can negotiate on the healthcare cost that each has to sustain. But, they do so subject to a central authority (CA) who can impose penalties to both countries whenever they cannot reach an agreement. We analyse the outcome of such situation via the Nash bargaining concept. Next we show how the CA should design penalties to i) ensure that revealing the true migration flow data is a self-enforcing behaviour, and to ii) enforce that the NB solution adheres to certain fairness properties.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | International Conference on Network Games Control and Optimization 2014 (Proceedings of the NetGCoop'14 |
Place of Publication | Trento, Italy |
Publisher | IEEE |
Pages | 180-187 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9788884435743 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Event | 7th International Conference on Network Games, Control and Optimization - Trento, Italy Duration: 29 Oct 2014 → 31 Oct 2014 Conference number: 7 |
Conference
Conference | 7th International Conference on Network Games, Control and Optimization |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | NetGCoop 2014 |
Country/Territory | Italy |
City | Trento |
Period | 29/10/14 → 31/10/14 |
Keywords
- Epidemic games
- Mechanism Design
- Nash bargaining
- Truth revealing