Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide in US men and women at very high risk of fractures

BackgroundOsteoporotic-related fractures represent an increasing burden to patients, health care systems and society.AimsThis study estimated cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide (ABL) followed by alendronate (ALN) compared to relevant alternative strategies in US men and women aged 50 to 80 years at very high fracture risk (bone mineral density T-score <= - 2.5 and a recent fracture).MethodsA lifetime Markov-based microsimulation model was used to estimate healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Comparators were sequential treatment with unbranded teriparatide (TPTD)/ALN, generic ALN monotherapy, and no treatment. Analyses were conducted based on initial fracture site (hip, vertebral, or any fracture) and treatment efficacy data (derived from clinical trials or a recent network meta-analysis).ResultsFrom all analyses completed, sequential ABL/ALN demonstrated more QALYs for lower healthcare costs versus unbranded TPTD/ALN. No treatment was dominated (higher costs for less QALYs) versus ALN monotherapy. Sequential ABL/ALN resulted in favorable cost-effectiveness (at US threshold of $150,000/QALY) versus generic ALN monotherapy in men aged >= 50 years with any fracture type, women aged >= 65 years with any fracture type, and women aged >= 55 years having a hip or vertebral fracture.DiscussionSimilar cost-effectiveness of sequential ABL/ALN versus unbranded TPTD/ALN, ALN monotherapy, and no treatment was observed in both US men and women at very high fracture risk, with a moderate improvement in cost-effectiveness in men versus women and in patients with a hip or vertebral fracture.ConclusionsSequential therapy with ABL/ALN was cost-effective in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.