Chirurgische behandeling van stressincontinentie bij vrouwen: de impact van een andere kijk op polypropyleen

Translated title of the contribution: Surgical treatment of female stress incontinence: impact of changed views on polypropylene

John P.F.A. Heesakkers*, J. P. Roovers, Steven E. Schraffordt Koops

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The introduction of the tensionfree vaginal tape in 1995 drastically changed the landscape of surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Because of the uncomplicated technique many urologists and gynecologists embraced the procedure with tripled the number of annual procedures in the beginning of this century. At the same time polypropylene was used for the development of surgical procedures of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Especially the use of polypropylene for POP has caused many severe clinical complications. This caused a huge reduction of these kind of surgical procedures and it is performed nowadays only under strict conditions. At the same time the use of polypropylene for SUI was scrutinized and questioned. Nowadays, in the Ango-Saxon countries the use of polypropylene tapes for SUI is not recommended. This manuscript explores the role of polypropylene tapes for SUI. Questions that are dealt with are: How dangerous are polypropylene tapes anyway? What are the alternatives? Which factors contribute to a successful outcome of stress incontinence surgery?
Translated title of the contributionSurgical treatment of female stress incontinence: impact of changed views on polypropylene
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)121-129
Number of pages9
JournalTijdschrift voor Urologie
Volume11
Issue number6-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Mesh
  • Mid urethral sling (MUS)
  • Polypropylene
  • Tape

Cite this