China's sovereignty in international law: from historical grievance to pragmatic tool

Wim Muller*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The concept of sovereignty is at the heart of Chinese international legal discourse, as well as Chinese foreign policy. Yet there is no agreement among international lawyers, political scientists and theorists what exactly the notion of sovereignty means. This article provides a background to the different uses of the concept of sovereignty, legal, historical, and political, and describes how it has been used by the People’s Republic of China in various areas of practice, notably human rights, international criminal law and the law of intervention. It is argued that China’s use of sovereignty should be understood both from a historical and a legal perspective and that ultimately, the concept serves as a pragmatic tool to distinguish the realms of the legal and a political in a way that the Chinese government sees fit.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-59
Number of pages25
JournalChina-EU Law Journal
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • public international law
  • human rights
  • foreign policy
  • sovereignty
  • history
  • Intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'China's sovereignty in international law: from historical grievance to pragmatic tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this