Can we use machine learning to improve the interpretation and application of urodynamic data? International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society 2023

Andrew Gammie*, Salvador Arlandis, Bruna M. Couri, Michael Drinnan, D. Carolina Ochoa, Angie Rantell, Mathijs de Rijk, Thomas van Steenbergen, Margot Damaser

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: A “Think Tank” at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society meeting held in Bristol, United Kingdom in June 2023 considered the progress and promise of machine learning (ML) applied to urodynamic data. Methods: Examples of the use of ML applied to data from uroflowmetry, pressure flow studies and imaging were presented. The advantages and limitations of ML were considered. Recommendations made during the subsequent debate for research studies were recorded. Results: ML analysis holds great promise for the kind of data generated in urodynamic studies. To date, ML techniques have not yet achieved sufficient accuracy for routine diagnostic application. Potential approaches that can improve the use of ML were agreed and research questions were proposed. Conclusions: ML is well suited to the analysis of urodynamic data, but results to date have not achieved clinical utility. It is considered likely that further research can improve the analysis of the large, multifactorial data sets generated by urodynamic clinics, and improve to some extent data pattern recognition that is currently subject to observer error and artefactual noise.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • artifical intelligence
  • machine learning
  • pattern recognition
  • urodynamic data
  • urodynamics

Cite this