C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis

Stephen Kaptoge*, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Gordon Lowe, Mark B. Pepys, Simon G. Thompson, Rory Collins, John Danesh, R. W. Tipping, C. E. Ford, S. L. Pressel, G. Walldius, I. Jungner, A. R. Folsom, L. Chambless, C. M. Ballantyne, D. Panagiotakos, C. Pitsavos, C. Chrysohoou, C. Stefanadis, M. W. KnuimanU. Goldbourt, M. Benderly, D. Tanne, P. Whincup, S. G. Wannamethee, R. W. Morris, S. Kiechl, J. Willeit, A. Mayr, G. Schett, N. Wald, S. Ebrahim, D. Lawlor, J. Yarnell, J. Gallacher, E. Casiglia, V. Tikhonoff, P. J. Nietert, L. Simons, A. Lee, C. L. Phillips, P. A. Wolf, G. Lappas, C. D. A. Stehouwer, Author collaboration

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Associations of C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration with risk of major diseases can best be assessed by long-term prospective follow-up of large numbers of people. We assessed the associations of CRP concentration with risk of vascular and non-vascular outcomes under different circumstances.Methods We meta-analysed individual records of 160 309 people without a history of vascular disease (ie, 1.31 million person-years at risk, 27769 fatal or non-fatal disease outcomes) from 54 long-term prospective studies. Within-study regression analyses were adjusted for within-person variation in risk factor levels.Results Log(c) CRP concentration was linearly associated with several conventional risk factors and inflammatory markers, and nearly log-linearly with the risk of ischaemic vascular disease and non-vascular mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) for coronary heart disease per 1-SD higher log, CRP concentration (three-fold higher) were 1.63 (95% CI 1.51-1.76) when initially adjusted for age and sex only, and 1.37 (1.27-1.48) when adjusted further for conventional risk factors; 1.44 (1.32-1.57) and 1.27 (1.15-1.40) for ischaemic stroke; 1.71 (1.53-1.91) and 1.55 (1.37-1.76) for vascular mortality; and 1.55 (1.41-1.69) and 1.54 (1.40-1.68) for non-vascular mortality RRs were largely unchanged after exclusion of smokers or initial follow-up. After further adjustment for fibrinogen, the corresponding RRs were 1.23 (1.07-1.42) for coronary heart disease; 1.32 (1.18-1.49) for ischaemic stroke; 1.34 (1.18-1.52) for vascular mortality; and 1.34 (1.20-1.50) for non-vascular mortality.Interpretation CRP concentration has continuous associations with the risk of coronary heart disease, ischaemic stroke, vascular mortality, and death from several cancers and lung disease that are each of broadly similar size. The relevance of CRP to such a range of disorders is unclear. Associations with ischaemic vascular disease depend considerably on conventional risk factors and other markers of inflammation.Funding British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, BUPA Foundation, and GlaxoSmithKline.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-140
Number of pages9
JournalLancet
Volume375
Issue number9709
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2010

Keywords

  • Low-density-lipoprotein
  • Cardiovascular-disease
  • Regression dilution
  • Plasma-fibrinogen
  • Nonvascular mortality
  • Independent predictor
  • Inflammation
  • Associations
  • Markers
  • Women

Cite this