An overview of innovative living arrangements within long-term care and their characteristics: a scoping review

Mara Brouwers*, Damien S. E. Broekharst, Bram de Boer, Wim G. Groen, Hilde Verbeek

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

BackgroundWithin long-term care, a culture change (e.g. focus on increasing autonomy in everyday life) is leading to the development of innovative living arrangements for older adults. Insight into characteristics of innovative living arrangements, which are described as an alternative to regular nursing homes, is lacking. This review aims to provide an overview of innovative living arrangements and to describe their defining characteristics.MethodsA scoping review was performed following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses with extension, for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was also followed. The databases PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Articles, published between 2012 and 2023 were included when they presented an innovative living arrangement as an alternative to regular nursing homes. A thematic analysis was performed, describing the physical, social, and organizational environment of the innovative living arrangements.ResultsFifty-six articles were identified describing seven types of distinct innovative living arrangements: small-scale living, the green house model, shared housing arrangements, green care farms, dementia villages, group homes, intergenerational living, and an 'other' category. The themes included supporting autonomy and creating a small-scale and/or homelike environment, which were emphasized in most innovative living arrangements. Other themes, such as involvement of the community, focus on nature, integration of work tasks, and involvement of family members, were emphasized in a subsection of the described living arrangements. Twenty-eight articles reported on the effects of the innovative living environment on residents, family members, or staff members. Most articles (N = 22) studied resident-related outcomes, focusing mainly on quality of life and aspects of daily life.ConclusionMore insight into the mechanisms of the social and organizational environments is needed, which may lead to greater transparency and homogeneity regarding the description of living arrangements. This review shows that more knowledge is needed about the potential key elements of innovative living arrangements, especially related to their social and organizational environment. This may provide a better guide for developers within long-term care.
Original languageEnglish
Article number442
Number of pages13
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Innovative living arrangements
  • Innovation
  • Long-term care
  • 24-hour care
  • Nursing home care
  • Older adults
  • Scoping review
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • SHARED-HOUSING ARRANGEMENTS
  • PERSON-CENTERED CARE
  • HOME-LIKE FACILITIES
  • SMALL-SCALE
  • NURSING-HOME
  • DEMENTIA-CARE
  • RESIDENTIAL CARE
  • FAMILY CAREGIVERS
  • HEALTH OUTCOMES

Cite this