Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study

Kirsty Boyd*, Bruce Mason, Marilyn Kendall, Stephen Barclay, David Chinn, Keri Thomas, Aziz Sheikh, Scott A. Murray

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

56 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Advance care planning is being promoted as a central component of end-of-life policies in many developed countries, but there is concern that professionals find its implementation challenging.To assess the feasibility of implementing advance care planning in UK primary care.Mixed methods evaluation of a pilot educational intervention.Four general practices in south-east Scotland.Interviews with 20 GPs and eight community nurses before and after a practice-based workshop; this was followed by telephone interviews with nine other GPs with a special interest in palliative care from across the UK.End-of-life care planning for patients typically starts as an urgent response to clear evidence of a short prognosis, and aims to achieve a 'good death'. Findings suggest that there were multiple barriers to earlier planning: prognostic uncertainty; limited collaboration with secondary care; a desire to maintain hope; and resistance to any kind of 'tick-box' approach. Following the workshop, participants' knowledge and skills were enhanced but there was little evidence of more proactive planning. GPs from other parts of the UK described confusion over terminology and were concerned about the difficulties of implementing inflexible, policy-driven care.A clear divide was found between UK policy directives and delivery of end-of-life care in the community that educational interventions targeting primary care professionals are unlikely to address. Advance care planning has the potential to promote autonomy and shared decision making about end-of-life care, but this will require a significant shift in attitudes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e449-e458
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume60
Issue number581
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Cite this