A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm: Evidence from Eastern and Western samples

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is well established that processing information in relation to oneself (i.e., self-referencing) leads to better memory for that information than processing that same information in relation to others (i.e., other-referencing). However, it is unknown whether self-referencing also leads to more false memories than other-referencing does. In the current two experiments with European and East Asian samples, we presented participants the Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists together with their own name or other people's name (i.e., "Trump" in Experiment 1 and "Li Ming" in Experiment 2). We found consistent results across the two experiments; that is, in the self-reference condition, participants had higher true and false memory rates compared with those in the other-reference condition. Moreover, we found that self-referencing did not exhibit superior mnemonic advantage in terms of net accuracy compared with other-referencing and neutral conditions. These findings are discussed in terms of theoretical frameworks such as spreading activation theories and the fuzzy-trace theory. We propose that our results reflect the adaptive nature of memory in the sense that cognitive processes that increase mnemonic efficiency may also increase susceptibility to associative false memories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-86
Number of pages11
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume47
Issue number1
Early online date23 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • SPREADING ACTIVATION
  • ADAPTIVE MEMORY
  • RECOGNITION
  • Self-reference
  • INFORMATION
  • RECALL
  • False memory
  • CULTURE
  • Fuzzy-trace theory
  • WORD LISTS
  • ASSOCIATIVE-ACTIVATION
  • Net accuracy
  • BINDING
  • Spreading activation
  • AGE

Cite this

@article{18301eac7f0a43739e616aca592bf5fc,
title = "A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm: Evidence from Eastern and Western samples",
abstract = "It is well established that processing information in relation to oneself (i.e., self-referencing) leads to better memory for that information than processing that same information in relation to others (i.e., other-referencing). However, it is unknown whether self-referencing also leads to more false memories than other-referencing does. In the current two experiments with European and East Asian samples, we presented participants the Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists together with their own name or other people's name (i.e., {"}Trump{"} in Experiment 1 and {"}Li Ming{"} in Experiment 2). We found consistent results across the two experiments; that is, in the self-reference condition, participants had higher true and false memory rates compared with those in the other-reference condition. Moreover, we found that self-referencing did not exhibit superior mnemonic advantage in terms of net accuracy compared with other-referencing and neutral conditions. These findings are discussed in terms of theoretical frameworks such as spreading activation theories and the fuzzy-trace theory. We propose that our results reflect the adaptive nature of memory in the sense that cognitive processes that increase mnemonic efficiency may also increase susceptibility to associative false memories.",
keywords = "Journal Article, SPREADING ACTIVATION, ADAPTIVE MEMORY, RECOGNITION, Self-reference, INFORMATION, RECALL, False memory, CULTURE, Fuzzy-trace theory, WORD LISTS, ASSOCIATIVE-ACTIVATION, Net accuracy, BINDING, Spreading activation, AGE",
author = "Jianqin Wang and Henry Otgaar and Howe, {Mark L} and Chu Zhou",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13421-018-0851-3",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "76--86",
journal = "Memory & Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society",
number = "1",

}

A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm : Evidence from Eastern and Western samples. / Wang, Jianqin; Otgaar, Henry; Howe, Mark L; Zhou, Chu.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 76-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm

T2 - Evidence from Eastern and Western samples

AU - Wang, Jianqin

AU - Otgaar, Henry

AU - Howe, Mark L

AU - Zhou, Chu

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - It is well established that processing information in relation to oneself (i.e., self-referencing) leads to better memory for that information than processing that same information in relation to others (i.e., other-referencing). However, it is unknown whether self-referencing also leads to more false memories than other-referencing does. In the current two experiments with European and East Asian samples, we presented participants the Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists together with their own name or other people's name (i.e., "Trump" in Experiment 1 and "Li Ming" in Experiment 2). We found consistent results across the two experiments; that is, in the self-reference condition, participants had higher true and false memory rates compared with those in the other-reference condition. Moreover, we found that self-referencing did not exhibit superior mnemonic advantage in terms of net accuracy compared with other-referencing and neutral conditions. These findings are discussed in terms of theoretical frameworks such as spreading activation theories and the fuzzy-trace theory. We propose that our results reflect the adaptive nature of memory in the sense that cognitive processes that increase mnemonic efficiency may also increase susceptibility to associative false memories.

AB - It is well established that processing information in relation to oneself (i.e., self-referencing) leads to better memory for that information than processing that same information in relation to others (i.e., other-referencing). However, it is unknown whether self-referencing also leads to more false memories than other-referencing does. In the current two experiments with European and East Asian samples, we presented participants the Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists together with their own name or other people's name (i.e., "Trump" in Experiment 1 and "Li Ming" in Experiment 2). We found consistent results across the two experiments; that is, in the self-reference condition, participants had higher true and false memory rates compared with those in the other-reference condition. Moreover, we found that self-referencing did not exhibit superior mnemonic advantage in terms of net accuracy compared with other-referencing and neutral conditions. These findings are discussed in terms of theoretical frameworks such as spreading activation theories and the fuzzy-trace theory. We propose that our results reflect the adaptive nature of memory in the sense that cognitive processes that increase mnemonic efficiency may also increase susceptibility to associative false memories.

KW - Journal Article

KW - SPREADING ACTIVATION

KW - ADAPTIVE MEMORY

KW - RECOGNITION

KW - Self-reference

KW - INFORMATION

KW - RECALL

KW - False memory

KW - CULTURE

KW - Fuzzy-trace theory

KW - WORD LISTS

KW - ASSOCIATIVE-ACTIVATION

KW - Net accuracy

KW - BINDING

KW - Spreading activation

KW - AGE

U2 - 10.3758/s13421-018-0851-3

DO - 10.3758/s13421-018-0851-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 30141171

VL - 47

SP - 76

EP - 86

JO - Memory & Cognition

JF - Memory & Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -