A scoping review into the explanations for differences in the degrees of shared decision making experienced by patients

Anne C. Zagt*, Nanne Bos, Max Bakker, Dolf de Boer, Roland D. Friele, Judith D. de Jong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Objectives: In order to improve the degree of shared decision making (SDM) experienced by patients, it is necessary to gain insight into the explanations for the differences in these degrees. Methods: A scoping review of the literature on the explanations for differences in the degree of SDM experienced by patients was conducted. We assessed 21,329 references. Ultimately, 308 studies were included. The explanations were divided into micro, meso, and macro levels. Results: The explanations are mainly related to the micro level. They include explanations related to the patient and healthcare professionals, the relationship between the patient and the physician, and the involvement of the patient's relatives. On the macro level, explanations are related to restrictions within the healthcare system such as time constraints, and adequate information about treatment options. On the meso level, explanations are related to the continuity of care and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. Conclusions: SDM is not an isolated process between the physician and patient. Explanations are connected to the macro, meso, and micro levels. Practice implications: This scoping review suggests that there could be more focus on explanations related to the macro and meso levels, and on how explanations at different levels are interrelated.
Original languageEnglish
Article number108030
Number of pages27
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume118
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Hospital care
  • Patient perspective
  • Shared decision making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A scoping review into the explanations for differences in the degrees of shared decision making experienced by patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this