A new tool to assess Clinical Diversity In Meta-analyses (CDIM) of interventions

M. Barbateskovic*, T.M. Koster, R.J. Eck, M. Maagaard, A. Afshari, F. Blokzijl, M. Cronhjort, W. Dieperink, M.L. Fabritius, J. Feinberg, C. French, B. Gareb, A. Geisler, A. Granholm, B. Hiemstra, R.X. Hu, G. Imberger, B.T. Jensen, A.B. Jonsson, O. KaramD.Z. Kong, S.K. Korang, G. Koster, B.Y. Lai, N. Liang, L.H. Lundstrom, S. Marker, T.S. Meyhoff, E.E. Nielsen, A.K. Norskov, M.W. Munch, E.C. Risom, S.L. Rygard, S. Safi, N. Sethi, F. Sjovall, S.V. Lauridsen, N. van Bakelen, M. Volbeda, I.C.C. van der Horst, C. Gluud, A. Perner, M.H. Moller, E. Keus, J. Wetterslev

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Web of Science)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-41
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume135
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Meta-analysis
  • Systematic review
  • Evidence
  • Quality
  • Heterogeneity
  • Diversity
  • Tool
  • AGREEMENT
  • HETEROGENEITY
  • RELIABILITY
  • GUIDELINES
  • REVIEWS
  • BIAS
  • RISK

Cite this