A Multicentre Trial of Patient specific Rehearsal Prior to EVAR: Impact on Procedural Planning and Team Performance

L. Desender*, I. Van Herzeele, M. Lachat, J. Duchateau, C. Bicknell, J. Teijink, J. Heyligers, F. Vermassen, PAVLOV Study Grp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Objective: Patient specific rehearsal (PsR) prior to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) enables the endovascular team to practice and evaluate the procedure prior to treating the real patient. This multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the utility of PsR prior to EVAR as a pre-operative planning and briefing tool.

Material and methods: Patients with an aneurysm suitable for EVAR were randomised to pre-operative or postoperative PsR. Before and after the PsR, the lead implanter completed a questionnaire to identify any deviation from the initial treatment plan. All team members completed a questionnaire evaluating realism, technical issues, and human factor aspects pertinent to PsR. Technical and human factor skills, and technical and clinical success rates were compared between the randomised groups.

Results: 100 patients were enrolled between September 2012 and June 2014. The plan to visualise proximal and distal landing zones was adapted in 27/50 (54%) and 38/50 (76%) cases, respectively. The choice of the main body, contralateral limb, or iliac extensions was adjusted in 8/50 (16%), 17/50 (34%), and 14/50 (28%) cases, respectively. At least one of the abovementioned parameters was changed in 44/50 (88%) cases. For 100 EVAR cases, 199 subjective questionnaires post-PsR were completed. PsR was considered to be useful for selecting the optimal C-arm angulation (median 4, IQR 4-5) and was recognised as a helpful tool for team preparation (median 4, IQR 4-4), to improve communication (median 4, IQR 3-4), and encourage confidence (median 4, IQR 3-4). Technical and human factor skills and technical and initial clinical success rates were similar between the randomisation groups.

Conclusion: PsR prior to EVAR has a significant impact on the treatment plan and may be useful as a preoperative planning and briefing tool. Subjective ratings indicate that this technology may facilitate planning of optimal C-arm angulation and improve non-technical skills. Trial registration: URL://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01632631. (C) 2016 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-361
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Patient simulation
  • Team performance
  • Endovascular procedures
  • Aneurysm
  • Teamwork
  • ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR
  • SURGERY
  • VALIDATION
  • SIMULATION
  • IMPLEMENTATION
  • SOFTWARE
  • ERROR
  • TOOL

Cite this