TY - JOUR
T1 - A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to compare a cervical pessary with a cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervical length and a history of preterm birth - PC study
AU - Koullali, Bouchra
AU - van Kempen, Liselotte E. M.
AU - van Zijl, Maud D.
AU - Naaktgeboren, Christiana A.
AU - Schuit, Ewoud
AU - Bekedam, Dick J.
AU - Franssen, Maureen T. M.
AU - Bijvank, Sebastiaan W. A. Nij
AU - Sueters, Marieke
AU - van Baal, Marchien
AU - de Boer, Marjon A.
AU - Hooker, Angelo B.
AU - Hermsen, Brenda B. J.
AU - Toolenaar, Toon A. A. M.
AU - Zwart, Joost J.
AU - van der Ham, David P.
AU - van der Made, Flip W.
AU - Prefumo, Federico
AU - de Tejada, Begona Martinez
AU - Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
AU - Huisjes, Anjoke J. M.
AU - Scheepers, Liesbeth H. C. J.
AU - van Hoorn, Marion E.
AU - Hasaart, Tom H. M.
AU - Schuitemaker, Nico W. E.
AU - Vollebregt, Karlijn C.
AU - Mueller, Moira A.
AU - Evers, Inge M.
AU - Post, Marinka S.
AU - de Boer, Karin
AU - Visser, Henricus
AU - van Charante, Nico A. Mensing
AU - Langenveld, Josje
AU - Steemers, Nicole Y. C.
AU - Mol, Ben W. J.
AU - Oudijk, Martijn A.
AU - Pajkrt, Eva
PY - 2017/7/6
Y1 - 2017/7/6
N2 - Background: Preterm birth is in quantity and in severity the most important contributor of perinatal morbidity and mortality both in well- and low-resource countries. Cervical pessary and cervical cerclage are both considered as preventive treatments in women at risk for preterm birth. We aim to evaluate whether a cervical pessary can replace cervical cerclage for preventing recurrent preterm birth in women with a prior preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency or in women with a prior preterm birth and a short cervix in the current pregnancy.Methods/design: A nationwide open-label multicentre randomised clinical trial will be set up to study women with a singleton pregnancy and a prior preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation. Women are eligible in case of previous preterm birth based on cervical insufficiency (primary intervention,Discussion: The outcome of this study will indicate the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of a cervical cerclage and of a cervical pessary.
AB - Background: Preterm birth is in quantity and in severity the most important contributor of perinatal morbidity and mortality both in well- and low-resource countries. Cervical pessary and cervical cerclage are both considered as preventive treatments in women at risk for preterm birth. We aim to evaluate whether a cervical pessary can replace cervical cerclage for preventing recurrent preterm birth in women with a prior preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency or in women with a prior preterm birth and a short cervix in the current pregnancy.Methods/design: A nationwide open-label multicentre randomised clinical trial will be set up to study women with a singleton pregnancy and a prior preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation. Women are eligible in case of previous preterm birth based on cervical insufficiency (primary intervention,Discussion: The outcome of this study will indicate the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of a cervical cerclage and of a cervical pessary.
KW - Preterm birth
KW - Prevention
KW - Cerclage
KW - Pessary
KW - Morbidity
KW - INCOMPETENCE
KW - RECURRENCE
KW - PREGNANCY
KW - PECEP
U2 - 10.1186/s12884-017-1393-6
DO - 10.1186/s12884-017-1393-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 28683739
SN - 1471-2393
VL - 17
JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
JF - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
IS - 1
M1 - 215
ER -