A Historical Review of the Role of Education: From Human Capital to Human Capabilities

Silvia Leoni*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Human capital theory is the dominant theory of education in economics. Earlier writers such as Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall highlighted a variety of roles for education, but human capital theory, which was formalised in the 1960s only examined labour-productivity improving skills. Other dimensions of education, which add complexity to the economic analysis of education, have been overshadowed by the focus on quantifying education’s economic value. These other dimensions include education’s role as a driver for individuals to improve their personal lives and avoid poverty. John Kenneth Galbraith and Amartya Sen supported this broader notion of education. Sen combined a multidimensional approach to education with the human capability approach, which centred around the person rather than the worker. This review highlights that crucial aspects of education have been disregarded during the formalisation of a unitary theory, and therefore are missing in empirical research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of Political Economy
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Aug 2023

JEL classifications

  • b12 - History of Economic Thought: Classical (includes Adam Smith)
  • b31 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals
  • j24 - "Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity"

Keywords

  • Adam Smith
  • Amartya Sen
  • capabilities
  • education
  • human capital

Cite this