[18F]FDG PET/CT-based response assessment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab with or without nitroglycerin patches

Evelyn E. C. de Jong*, Wouter van Elmpt, Ralph T. H. Leijenaar, Otto S. Hoekstra, Harry J. M. Groen, Egbert F. Smit, Ronald Boellaard, Vincent van der Noort, Esther G. C. Troost, Philippe Lambin, Anne-Marie C. Dingemans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Purpose Nitroglycerin (NTG) is a vasodilating drug, which increases tumor blood flow and consequently decreases hypoxia. Therefore, changes in [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F] FDG PET) uptake pattern may occur. In this analysis, we investigated the feasibility of [18F] FDG PET for response assessment to paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab (PCB) treatment with and without NTG patches. And we compared the [18F] FDG PET response assessment to RECIST response assessment and survival.

Methods A total of 223 stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were included in a phase II study (NCT01171170) randomizing between PCB treatment with or without NTG patches. For 60 participating patients, a baseline and a second [18F] FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) scan, performed between day 22 and 24 after the start of treatment, were available. Tumor response was defined as a 30 % decrease in CT and PET parameters, and was compared to RECIST response at week 6. The predictive value of these assessments for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed with and without NTG.

Results A 30 % decrease in SUVpeak assessment identified more patients as responders compared to a 30 % decrease in CT diameter assessment (73 % vs. 18 %), however, this was not correlated to OS (SUVpeak30 p = 0.833; CTdiameter30 p = 0.557). Changes in PET parameters between the baseline and the second scan were not significantly different for the NTG group compared to the control group (p value range 0.159-0.634). The CT-based (part of the [18F] FDG PET/CT) parameters showed a significant difference between the baseline and the second scan for the NTG group compared to the control group (CT diameter decrease of 7 +/- 23 % vs. 19 +/- 14 %, p = 0.016, respectively).

Conclusions The decrease in tumoral FDG uptake in advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy with and without NTG did not differ between both treatment arms. Early PET-based response assessment showed more tumor responders than CT-based response assessment (part of the [18F] FDG PET/CT); this was not correlated to survival. This might be due to timing of the [18F] FDG PET shortly after the bevacizumab infusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-16
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Keywords

  • [18F]FDG PET/CT
  • Response assessment
  • Nitroglycerin
  • Bevacizumab
  • Stage IV NSCLC
  • POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY
  • RANDOMIZED PHASE-II
  • TUMOR RESPONSE
  • F-18-FDG PET
  • HYPOXIA
  • CHEMOTHERAPY
  • QUANTIFICATION
  • CHEMOSENSITIVITY
  • ERLOTINIB
  • SURVIVAL

Cite this