Validation of an automated delirium prediction model (DElirium MOdel (DEMO)): an observational study

Carlota Mestres Gonzalvo*, Hugo A. J. M. de Wit, Brigit P. C. van Oijen, Debbie S. Deben, Kim P. G. M. Hurkens, Wubbo J. Mulder, Rob Janknegt, Jos M. G. A. Schols, Frans R. Verhey, Bjorn Winkens, Paul-Hugo M. van der Kuy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives Delirium is an underdiagnosed, severe and costly disorder, and 30%-40% of cases can be prevented. A fully automated model to predict delirium (DEMO) in older people has been developed, and the objective of this study is to validate the model in a hospital setting.

Setting Secondary care, one hospital with two locations.

Design Observational study.

Participants The study included 450 randomly selected patients over 60 years of age admitted to Zuyderland Medical Centre. Patients who presented with delirium on admission were excluded.

Primary outcome measures Development of delirium through chart review.

Results A total of 383 patients were included in this study. The analysis was performed for delirium within 1, 3 and 5 days after a DEMO score was obtained. Sensitivity was 87.1% (95% CI 0.756 to 0.939), 84.2% (95% CI 0.732 to 0.915) and 82.7% (95% CI 0.734 to 0.893) for 1, 3 and 5 days, respectively, after obtaining the DEMO score. Specificity was 77.9% (95% CI 0.729 to 0.882), 81.5% (95% CI 0.766 to 0.856) and 84.5% (95% CI 0.797 to 0.884) for 1, 3 and 5 days, respectively, after obtaining the DEMO score.

Conclusion DEMO is a satisfactory prediction model but needs further prospective validation with in-person delirium confirmation. In the future, DEMO will be applied in clinical practice so that physicians will be aware of when a patient is at an increased risk of developing delirium, which will facilitate earlier recognition and diagnosis, and thus will allow the implementation of prevention measures.

Original languageEnglish
Article number016654
Number of pages5
JournalBMJ Open
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • HOSPITALIZED OLDER PATIENTS
  • CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD
  • CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS
  • ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDICATION
  • PRECIPITATING FACTORS
  • METAANALYSIS
  • RISK
  • PROPHYLAXIS
  • INSTRUMENTS
  • POPULATION

Cite this