The questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy: A comparison between paper-and-pencil versus online formats in Italian samples

Marzia di Girolamo, Luciano Giromini*, Christina L. Winters, Colinda M.B. Serie, Corine de Ruiter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The most recent conceptualizations of empathy recognize affective empathy as distinct from cognitive empathy. Consequently, instruments that assess these 2 types of empathy have been developed. Among them, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) is a particularly promising, relatively new, self-report measure consisting of 31 items. To examine the cross-cultural adaptability of the QCAE, we investigated the psychometric properties of an Italian version in 2 samples and with 2 different formats of administration. Study 1 (n = 407) used archival data collected via paper and pencil; Study 2 (n = 285) used newly collected data, obtained with an online format. In these studies, in addition to the QCAE, 6 other instruments measuring empathy-related constructs (i.e., interpersonal competence, well-being, personality traits, emotion regulation, alexithymia, and emotion recognition) were administered, too. Data analysis focused on factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity. The findings of both studies provide support for the cross-cultural applicability of the QCAE, and reveal interesting associations between empathy and the other constructs under examination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-170
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume101
Issue number2
Early online date13 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • ASPERGER-SYNDROME
  • CROSS-VALIDATION
  • DIFFICULTIES
  • EMOTION REGULATION
  • INTERPERSONAL COMPETENCE
  • NORMAL ADULTS
  • RELIABILITY
  • TORONTO-ALEXITHYMIA-SCALE
  • VALIDITY
  • VERSION
  • FIT INDEXES

Cite this