Abstract
The cardioprotector monoHER does not interfere with the pharmacokinetics or the metabolism of the cardiotoxic agent doxorubicin in mice.
Abou El Hassan MA, Kedde MA, Zwiers UT, Bast A, van der Vijgh WJ.
Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Research Laboratory of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.abulhassan@vumc.nl
PURPOSE: Monohydroxyethylrutoside (monoHER) has proved to be a good protector against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity without interfering with the antitumor effect of doxorubicin. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is a pharmacokinetic interaction between monoHER and doxorubicin which may be involved in monoHER cardioprotection. METHODS: Mice were treated with monoHER (500 mg x kg(-1) i.v.) alone, monoHER 5 min after doxorubicin (10 mg x kg(-1) i.v.), doxorubicin alone and doxorubicin 5 min after monoHER. The levels of monoHER and doxorubicin(ol) in plasma and heart tissue were measured by HPLC 24 h and 48 h after monoHER and doxorubicin administration, respectively. RESULTS: The areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of monoHER and doxorubicin(ol) were not affected by the coadministered drug. No changes were observed in pharmacokinetic parameters such as initial and final half-lives, mean residence time, clearance and volume of distribution of monoHER and doxorubicin(ol) after single or combined administration. CONCLUSION: The cardioprotection of monoHER in mice is not caused by a pharmacokinetic interaction between monoHER and doxorubicin.
Abou El Hassan MA, Kedde MA, Zwiers UT, Bast A, van der Vijgh WJ.
Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Research Laboratory of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.abulhassan@vumc.nl
PURPOSE: Monohydroxyethylrutoside (monoHER) has proved to be a good protector against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity without interfering with the antitumor effect of doxorubicin. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is a pharmacokinetic interaction between monoHER and doxorubicin which may be involved in monoHER cardioprotection. METHODS: Mice were treated with monoHER (500 mg x kg(-1) i.v.) alone, monoHER 5 min after doxorubicin (10 mg x kg(-1) i.v.), doxorubicin alone and doxorubicin 5 min after monoHER. The levels of monoHER and doxorubicin(ol) in plasma and heart tissue were measured by HPLC 24 h and 48 h after monoHER and doxorubicin administration, respectively. RESULTS: The areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of monoHER and doxorubicin(ol) were not affected by the coadministered drug. No changes were observed in pharmacokinetic parameters such as initial and final half-lives, mean residence time, clearance and volume of distribution of monoHER and doxorubicin(ol) after single or combined administration. CONCLUSION: The cardioprotection of monoHER in mice is not caused by a pharmacokinetic interaction between monoHER and doxorubicin.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 306-310 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2003 |