Research output

Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Associated researcher

Associated organisations

Abstract

The present study investigated the beliefs of students and police officers about cues to deception. A total of 95 police officers and 104 undergraduate students filled out a questionnaire addressing beliefs about cues to deception. Twenty-eight verbal cues were included in the questionnaire, all extracted from verbal credibility assessment tools (i.e., CBCA, RM, and SCAN). We investigated to what extent beliefs about nonverbal and verbal cues of deception differed between lay people (students) and police officers, and whether these beliefs were in agreement with objective cues known from research. Both students and police officers believed the usual stereotypical, but non-diagnostic (nonverbal) cues such as gaze aversion and increased movement to be indicative of deception. Yet, participants were less inclined to overestimate the relationship between verbal cues and deception and their beliefs fitted better with what we know from research. The implications of these findings for practice are discussed.

    Research areas

  • CONFIRMATION BIAS, LIE DETECTION, ACCURACY, TRUTH, CBCA, SUSPECTS, ABILITY, CREDIBILITY, PREVALENCE, STATEMENTS

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 209 KB, PDF-document

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0156615
Number of pages19
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2016