TY - JOUR
T1 - Shrimp export from Benin vs food safety in Europe: reconcilable interests?
AU - Kindji Gaspard, K.
AU - Faure, M.G.
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - In order to secure their fishery products market share in the EU, third countries, especially the developing ones, tend to transplant EU requirements into their domestic legal order. In reality, theses transplanted laws do not correspond to measures to reach a level of protection needed by the country of destination. Based upon the case of Benin, this paper intends to show that when these legal transplants are adversely made, they can in some cases have disastrous effects. It can be argued that an unintended result of EU policy was that it contributed to the collapse of the shrimp industry in Benin. The paper moreover argues that despite the stringency of the EU requirements, the implementation of its control policy might inadequately protect European consumers of shrimp.
AB - In order to secure their fishery products market share in the EU, third countries, especially the developing ones, tend to transplant EU requirements into their domestic legal order. In reality, theses transplanted laws do not correspond to measures to reach a level of protection needed by the country of destination. Based upon the case of Benin, this paper intends to show that when these legal transplants are adversely made, they can in some cases have disastrous effects. It can be argued that an unintended result of EU policy was that it contributed to the collapse of the shrimp industry in Benin. The paper moreover argues that despite the stringency of the EU requirements, the implementation of its control policy might inadequately protect European consumers of shrimp.
U2 - 10.1017/S1867299X00003597
DO - 10.1017/S1867299X00003597
M3 - Article
SN - 1867-299X
VL - 5
SP - 187
EP - 200
JO - European Journal of Risk Regulation
JF - European Journal of Risk Regulation
IS - 2
ER -