TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Comparison Between the Cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis and Omnifit: 2-Year DEXA and Minimum 10-Year Clinical Follow-Up
AU - ten Broeke, Rene H. M.
AU - Harings, Steffie E. J. M.
AU - Emans, Pieter J.
AU - Jutten, Liesbeth M. C.
AU - Kessels, Alfons G. H.
AU - Geesink, Rudolph G. T.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - Radiostereometry (RSA) of the cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis (SHP) reported excessive migration and predicted high failure rates. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared minimum 10 years results of the SHP (n=38) with the Omnifit-stem (n=37). Two-year bone remodelling, compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and assessed in regions of interest A-D based on the 7 Gruen zones, showed better periprosthetic bone preservation around the SHP in all but one regions (P
AB - Radiostereometry (RSA) of the cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis (SHP) reported excessive migration and predicted high failure rates. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared minimum 10 years results of the SHP (n=38) with the Omnifit-stem (n=37). Two-year bone remodelling, compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and assessed in regions of interest A-D based on the 7 Gruen zones, showed better periprosthetic bone preservation around the SHP in all but one regions (P
KW - hip arthroplasty
KW - cemented
KW - radiostereometry
KW - finite element analysis
KW - bone mineral density
KW - bone densitometryy
U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024
DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 23453292
SN - 0883-5403
VL - 28
SP - 1354
EP - 1361
JO - Journal of Arthroplasty
JF - Journal of Arthroplasty
IS - 8
ER -