TY - JOUR
T1 - Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy
AU - Giesen-Bloo, J.
AU - van Dyck, R.
AU - Spinhoven, P.
AU - van Tilburg, W.
AU - Dirksen, C.D.
AU - van Asselt, T.
AU - Kremers, I.
AU - Nadort, M.
AU - Arntz, A.R.
PY - 2006/1/1
Y1 - 2006/1/1
N2 - Context: Borderline personality disorder is a severe and chronic psychiatric condition, prevalent throughout health care settings. Only limited effects of current treatments have been documented. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of schema-focused therapy (SFT) and psychodynamically based transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) in patients with borderline personality disorder. Design: A multicenter, randomized, 2-group design. Setting: Four general community mental health centers. Participants: Eighty-eight patients with a Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score greater than a predetermined cutoff score. Intervention: Three years of either SFT or TFP with sessions twice a week. Main Outcome Measures: Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score; quality of life; general psychopathologic dysfunction; and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts. Patient assessments were made before randomization and then every 3 months for 3 years. Results: Data on 44 SFT patients and 42 TFP patients were available. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the groups were similar at baseline. Survival analyses revealed a higher dropout risk for TFP patients than for SFT patients (P = .01). Using an intention-to-treat approach, statistically and clinically significant improvements were found for both treatments on all measures after 1-, 2-, and 3- year treatment periods. After 3 years of treatment, survival analyses demonstrated that significantly more SFT patients recovered (relative risk = 2.18; P = .04) or showed reliable clinical improvement (relative risk = 2.33; P = .009) on the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version. Robust analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that they also improved more in general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts (P <.001). Finally, SFT patients showed greater increases in quality of life than TFP patients (robust ANCOVAs, P = .03 and P <.001). Conclusions: Three years of SFT or TFP proved to be effective in reducing borderline personality disorder specific and general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP concepts and in improving quality of life; SFT is more effective than TFP for all measures.
AB - Context: Borderline personality disorder is a severe and chronic psychiatric condition, prevalent throughout health care settings. Only limited effects of current treatments have been documented. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of schema-focused therapy (SFT) and psychodynamically based transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) in patients with borderline personality disorder. Design: A multicenter, randomized, 2-group design. Setting: Four general community mental health centers. Participants: Eighty-eight patients with a Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score greater than a predetermined cutoff score. Intervention: Three years of either SFT or TFP with sessions twice a week. Main Outcome Measures: Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score; quality of life; general psychopathologic dysfunction; and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts. Patient assessments were made before randomization and then every 3 months for 3 years. Results: Data on 44 SFT patients and 42 TFP patients were available. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the groups were similar at baseline. Survival analyses revealed a higher dropout risk for TFP patients than for SFT patients (P = .01). Using an intention-to-treat approach, statistically and clinically significant improvements were found for both treatments on all measures after 1-, 2-, and 3- year treatment periods. After 3 years of treatment, survival analyses demonstrated that significantly more SFT patients recovered (relative risk = 2.18; P = .04) or showed reliable clinical improvement (relative risk = 2.33; P = .009) on the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version. Robust analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that they also improved more in general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts (P <.001). Finally, SFT patients showed greater increases in quality of life than TFP patients (robust ANCOVAs, P = .03 and P <.001). Conclusions: Three years of SFT or TFP proved to be effective in reducing borderline personality disorder specific and general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP concepts and in improving quality of life; SFT is more effective than TFP for all measures.
U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.649
DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.649
M3 - Article
SN - 0003-990X
VL - 63
SP - 649
EP - 658
JO - Archives of General Psychiatry
JF - Archives of General Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -