Optimal cost sharing for capacitated facility location games

T. Harks, P. von Falkenhausen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We consider cost sharing for a class of facility location games, where the strategy space of each player consists of the bases of a player-specific matroid defined on the set of resources. We assume that resources have nondecreasing load-dependent costs and player-specific delays. Our model includes the important special case of capacitated facility location problems, where players have to jointly pay for opened facilities. The goal is to design cost sharing protocols so as to minimize the resulting price of anarchy and price of stability. We investigate two classes of protocols: basic protocols guarantee the existence of at least one pure Nash equilibrium and separable protocols additionally require that the resulting cost shares only depend on the set of players on a resource. We find optimal basic and separable protocols that guarantee the price of stability/price of anarchy to grow logarithmically/linearly in the number of players. These results extend our previous results (cf. von Falkenhausen & Harks, 2013), where optimal basic and separable protocols were given for the case of symmetric matroid games without delays.

We finally study the complexity of computing optimal cost shares. We derive several hardness results showing that optimal cost shares cannot be approximated in polynomial time within a logarithmic factor in the number of players, unless P = NP. For a restricted class of problems that include the above hard instances, we devise an approximation algorithm matching the logarithmic bound.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-198
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume239
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2014

Keywords

  • Game theory
  • Complexity theory
  • WEIGHTED CONGESTION GAMES
  • PURE NASH EQUILIBRIA
  • NETWORK DESIGN
  • COORDINATION MECHANISMS
  • EFFICIENCY
  • ALLOCATION
  • PRICE
  • FLOW

Cite this