Abstract
This article describes the process of conducting meta-analyses following the approach of Hunter and Schmidt (2004). For each step we present focal citations and examples of good practice, and compare distinct procedures for typical judgment call situations. We address researchers that seek practical guidance when conducting a meta-analysis with artefact corrections and suggest strategies for communicating meta-analytical results in science as well as practical contexts.
Original language | German |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 186-205 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Keywords
- CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS
- CREDIBILITY INTERVALS
- EFFECT SIZES
- EMPLOYEE TURNOVER
- INDIRECT RANGE RESTRICTION
- JOB-ATTITUDES
- META-ANALYSIS
- RANDOM-EFFECTS MODELS
- REALISTIC CONDITIONS
- VALIDITY GENERALIZATION
- methodology
- psychometric meta-analysis
- tutorial