Improved Cerebrospinal Fluid-Based Discrimination between Alzheimer's Disease Patients and Controls after Correction for Ventricular Volumes

Linda J. C. van Waalwijk van Doorn, Juan D. Gispert, H. Bea Kuiperij, Jurgen A. H. R. Claassen, Andrea Arighi, Ines Baldeiras, Kaj Blennow, Marco Bozzali, Miguel Castelo-Branco, Enrica Cavedo, Derya D. Emek-Savas, Erden Eren, Paolo Eusebi, Lucia Farotti, Chiara Fenoglio, Juan Fortea Ormaechea, Yvonne Freund-Levi, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Daniela Galimberti, Sermin GencViviana Greco, Harald Hampel, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Yawu Liu, Albert Llado, Alberto Lleo, Flavio M. Nobili, Kader K. Oguz, Lucilla Parnetti, Joao Pereira, Agnese Picco, Maria Pikkarainen, Catarina Resende de Oliveira, Esen Saka, Nicola Salvadori, Raquel Sanchez-Valle, Isabel Santana, Elio Scarpini, Philip Scheltens, Hilkka Soininen, Roberto Tarducci, Charlotte Teunissen, Magda Tsolaki, Andrea Urbani, Eduard Vilaplana, Pieter Jelle Visser, Asa K. Wallin, Gorsev Yener, Jose L. Molinuevo, Olga Meulenbroek, Marcel M. Verbeek*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers may support the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We studied if the diagnostic power of AD CSF biomarker concentrations, i.e., A beta(42), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), is affected by differences in lateral ventricular volume (VV), using CSF biomarker data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 730 subjects, from 13 European Memory Clinics. We developed a Matlab-algorithm for standardized automated segmentation analysis of T1 weighted MRI scans in SPM8 for determining VV, and computed its ratio with total intracranial volume (TIV) as proxy for total CSF volume. The diagnostic power of CSF biomarkers (and their combination), either corrected for VV/TIV ratio or not, was determined by ROC analysis. CSF A beta(42) levels inversely correlated to VV/TIV in the whole study population (A beta(42): r = -0.28; p <0.0001). For CSF t-tau and p-tau, this association only reached statistical significance in the combined MCI and AD group (t-tau: r = -0.15; p-tau: r = -0.13; both p <0.01). Correction for differences in VV/TIV improved the differentiation of AD versus controls based on CSF A beta(42) alone (AUC: 0.75 versus 0.81) or in combination with t-tau (AUC: 0.81 versus 0.91). In conclusion, differences in VV may be an important confounder in interpreting CSF A beta(42) levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-555
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • amyloid biomarkers
  • cerebrospinal fluid
  • lateral ventricles
  • tau protein
  • MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
  • AD-CSF-INDEX
  • NATIONAL INSTITUTE
  • ASSOCIATION WORKGROUPS
  • DIAGNOSTIC GUIDELINES
  • BRAIN ATROPHY
  • BIOMARKERS
  • DEMENTIA
  • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • TAU

Cite this