Abstract
Research suggests that respondents vary in their tendency to use the response scale of typical (Likert-style) questionnaires. We study the nature of the response process by applying a recently introduced item response theory modeling procedure, the three-process model, to data of self- and observer reports of personality traits. The three-process model captures indifferent, directional, and extreme responding. Substantively, we hypothesize that, and test whether, trait Honesty-Humility is negatively linked to extreme responding. We applied the three-process model to personality data of 577 dyads (self- and observer reports of the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised; Lee & Ashton, 2006) of Dutch and German undergraduate respondents. First, we provide evidence that indifferent, directional, and extreme responding can be separated from each other in personality data through the use of the three-process model. Second, we show that the various response processes show a pattern of correlations across traits and rating sources which is in line with the idea that indifferent and extreme responding are person-specific tendencies, whereas directional responding is content-specific. Third, we report findings supporting the hypothesis that Honesty-Humility is negatively linked to extreme responding. In Likert-based personality data, applying the three-process model can unveil individual differences in the response process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 461–472 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Personality |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 12 Mar 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2016 |
Keywords
- INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
- HONESTY-HUMILITY
- STYLE
- HEXACO
- INTELLIGENCE
- PREDICTORS
- COUNTRIES
- BEHAVIOR
- TRAITS
- SCALES