TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging
AU - van Stiphout, Ruud G. P. M.
AU - Lammering, Guido
AU - Buijsen, Jeroen
AU - Janssen, Marco N. M.
AU - Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
AU - Slagmolen, Pieter
AU - Lambrecht, Maarten
AU - Rubello, Domenico
AU - Gava, Marcello
AU - Giordano, Alessandro
AU - Postma, Eric O.
AU - Haustermans, Karin
AU - Capirci, Carlo
AU - Valentini, Vincenzo
AU - Lambin, Philippe
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - Purpose: To develop and validate an accurate predictive model and a nomogram for pathologic complete response (pCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data. Accurate prediction could enable more individualised surgical approaches, including less extensive resection or even a wait-and-see policy. Methods and materials: Population based databases from 953 patients were collected from four different institutes and divided into three groups: clinical factors (training: 677 patients, validation: 85 patients), pre-CRT PET-CT (training: 114 patients, validation: 37 patients) and post-CRT PET-CT (training: 107 patients, validation: 55 patients). A pCR was defined as ypT0N0 reported by pathology after surgery. The data were analysed using a linear multivariate classification model (support vector machine), and the model's performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The occurrence rate of pCR in the datasets was between 15% and 31%. The model based on clinical variables (AUC(train) = 0.61 +/- 0.03, AUC(validation) = 0.69 +/- 0.08) resulted in the following predictors: cT- and cN-stage and tumour length. Addition of pre-CRT PET data did not result in a significantly higher performance (AUC(train) = 0.68 +/- 0.08, AUC(validation) = 0.68 +/- 0.10) and revealed maximal radioactive isotope uptake (SUV(max)) and tumour location as extra predictors. The best model achieved was based on the addition of post-CRT PET-data (AUC(train) = 0.83 +/- 0.05, AUC(validation) = 0.86 +/- 0.05) and included the following predictors: tumour length, post-CRT SUV(max) and relative change of SUV(max). This model performed significantly better than the clinical model (p(train) <0.001, p(validation) = 0.056). Conclusions: The model and the nomogram developed based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data can accurately predict pCR, and can be used as a decision support tool for surgery after prospective validation.
AB - Purpose: To develop and validate an accurate predictive model and a nomogram for pathologic complete response (pCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data. Accurate prediction could enable more individualised surgical approaches, including less extensive resection or even a wait-and-see policy. Methods and materials: Population based databases from 953 patients were collected from four different institutes and divided into three groups: clinical factors (training: 677 patients, validation: 85 patients), pre-CRT PET-CT (training: 114 patients, validation: 37 patients) and post-CRT PET-CT (training: 107 patients, validation: 55 patients). A pCR was defined as ypT0N0 reported by pathology after surgery. The data were analysed using a linear multivariate classification model (support vector machine), and the model's performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The occurrence rate of pCR in the datasets was between 15% and 31%. The model based on clinical variables (AUC(train) = 0.61 +/- 0.03, AUC(validation) = 0.69 +/- 0.08) resulted in the following predictors: cT- and cN-stage and tumour length. Addition of pre-CRT PET data did not result in a significantly higher performance (AUC(train) = 0.68 +/- 0.08, AUC(validation) = 0.68 +/- 0.10) and revealed maximal radioactive isotope uptake (SUV(max)) and tumour location as extra predictors. The best model achieved was based on the addition of post-CRT PET-data (AUC(train) = 0.83 +/- 0.05, AUC(validation) = 0.86 +/- 0.05) and included the following predictors: tumour length, post-CRT SUV(max) and relative change of SUV(max). This model performed significantly better than the clinical model (p(train) <0.001, p(validation) = 0.056). Conclusions: The model and the nomogram developed based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data can accurately predict pCR, and can be used as a decision support tool for surgery after prospective validation.
KW - Response prediction
KW - PET imaging
KW - Machine learning
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - External validation
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 21176986
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 98
SP - 126
EP - 133
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -