Computer-Interpreted Electrocardiograms Benefits and Limitations

Jürg Schläpfer*, Hein J. Wellens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Computerized interpretation of the electrocardiogram (CIE) was introduced to improve the correct interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG), facilitating health care decision making and reducing costs. Worldwide, millions of ECGs are recorded annually, with the majority automatically analyzed, followed by an immediate interpretation. Limitations in the diagnostic accuracy of CIE were soon recognized and still persist, despite ongoing improvement in ECG algorithms. Unfortunately, inexperienced physicians ordering the ECG may fail to recognize interpretation mistakes and accept the automated diagnosis without criticism. Clinical mismanagement may result, with the risk of exposing patients to useless investigations or potentially dangerous treatment. Consequently, CIE over-reading and confirmation by an experienced ECG reader are essential and are repeatedly recommended in published reports. Implementation of new ECG knowledge is also important. The current status of automated ECG interpretation is reviewed, with suggestions for improvement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1183-1192
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume70
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • algorithms
  • software
  • HEART-ASSOCIATION ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY
  • OF-CARDIOLOGY-FOUNDATION
  • SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT
  • ARRHYTHMIAS COMMITTEE
  • CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY
  • AHA/ACCF/HRS RECOMMENDATIONS
  • EARLY REPOLARIZATION
  • QT INTERVAL
  • DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE
  • ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION

Cite this