A Response to Penders: The Disvalue of Vagueness in Authorship

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	17-17
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume	14
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9770-4
Publication status	Published - Mar 2017

Keywords

@article{afcad95e5aa64ec18b0b52b64d252763,

title = "A Response to Penders: The Disvalue of Vagueness in Authorship",

keywords = "Authorship, Tinkering, Credit, Organization of science, Reward infrastructures, Interdisciplinarity",

author = "David Shaw",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s11673-017-9770-4",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "17--17",

journal = "Journal of Bioethical Inquiry",

issn = "1176-7529",

publisher = "Springer, Cham",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Response to Penders

T2 - The Disvalue of Vagueness in Authorship

AU - Shaw, David

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

KW - Authorship

KW - Tinkering

KW - Credit

KW - Organization of science

KW - Reward infrastructures

KW - Interdisciplinarity

U2 - 10.1007/s11673-017-9770-4

DO - 10.1007/s11673-017-9770-4

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 28205103

SN - 1176-7529

VL - 14

SP - 17

EP - 17

JO - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

JF - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

IS - 1

ER -