View graph of relations
  1. 2018
  2. Published
  3. Published
    Hommels, A. (2018). How resilience discourses shape cities: the case of Resilient Rotterdam. In S. Amir (Ed.), On Bouncing Back. The Sociotechnical Constitution of Resilience (pp. 265-284). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Published
    Hommels, A. (2018). Re-Assembling a City: Applying SCOT to Post-Disaster Urban Change. In M. Kurath, M. Marskamp, J. Paulos, & J. Ruegg (Eds.), Relational Planning: Tracing Artefacts, Agency and Practices (pp. 205-227). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. 2017
  6. Published
  7. Published
    Hommels, A. (2017). Obduracy: de hardheid van techniek. In H. van Lente, T. Swierstra, S. Wyatt, & R. Zeiss (Eds.), Wegwijs in STS - Knowing your way in STS (pp. 53-57). Datawyse.
  8. Published
    Hommels, A. M. (2017). Urban Resilience. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118430873.est0551
  9. 2015
  10. Published
    Egyedi, T. M., & Hommels, A. M. (2015). Predatory strategies in standards wars: On creating fear, uncertainty, and doubt. In K. Jakobs (Ed.), Effective Standardization Management in Corporate Settings (pp. 333-352). Hershey: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9737-9.ch015
  11. 2014
  12. Published
    Hommels, A. M., Versluis, E., Fox, T., & van Asselt, M. (2014). Regulating risks by rules: Compliance and Negotiated Drift in the Dutch Chemical Industry under the Seveso Regime. In A. Hommels, J. Mesman, & W. B. Bijker (Eds.), Vulnerability in Technological Cultures. New Directions in Research and Governance (pp. 243-266). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Published
    Bijker, W. E., Hommels, A. M., & Mesman, J. (2014). Studying Vulnerability in Technological Cultures. In A. Hommels, J. Mesman, & W. E. Bijker (Eds.), Vulnerability in Technological Cultures. New Directions in Research and Governance (pp. 1-26). Cambrdige, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Published
  15. 2013
  16. Published
    Vleuten, van der, E., Hogselius, P., Hommels, A. M., & Kaijser, A. (2013). Europe's critical infrastructure and its vulnerabilities - promises, problems, paradoxes. In P. Hogselius, A. Hommels, A. Kaijser, & E. Vleuten, van der (Eds.), The making of Europe's critical infrastructure. Common connections and shared vulnerabilities (pp. 3-19). Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Published
    Hommels, A. M., Hogselius, P., Kaijser, A., & Vleuten, van der, E. (2013). Europe's Infrastructure Vulnerabilities: Comparisons and Connections. In P. Hogselius, A. Hommels, A. Kaijser, & E. Vleuten, van der (Eds.), The Making of Europe's Critical Infrastructure. Common Connections and Shared Vulnerabilities (pp. 263-277). Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Published
  19. Published
    Hogselius, P., Hommels, A. M., Kaijser, A., & Vleuten, van der, E. (2013). The Making of Europe's Critical Infrastructure. Common Connections and Shared Vulnerabilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  20. 2010
  21. Published
  22. Published
    Versluis, E., van Asselt, M. B. A., Fox, T., & Hommels, A. M. (2010). Calculable Risks? An Analysis of the European Seveso Regime. In M. Goodwin, B-J. Koops, & R. Leenes (Eds.), Dimensions of Technology Regulation (pp. 21-37). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
  23. Published
  24. 2009
  25. Published
    Hommels, A. M., & Egyedi, T. M. (2009). Beyond the 'point of no return': Constructing irreversibility in decision making on the Tetra standard in Dutch emergency communication. In N. Beauvais-Schwarz, & F. Bousquet (Eds.), 14th EURAS Annual Standardisation Conference 'Standardisation and Corporate Intelligence' (pp. 83-98). Cergy Pontoise: Wissenschafts Verlag Mainz in Aachen..
  26. Published
    Hommels, A. M. (2009). Changing Obdurate Urban Objects: the attempts to reconstruct the highway through Maastricht. In I. Farias, & T. Bender (Eds.), Urban Assemblages. How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studie (pp. 139-159). London: Routlegde.
  27. Published
    Hommels, A. M., & Egyedi, T. (2009). The Costs of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) in the War on Digital Radio Communication. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (pp. 1-13). Tokyo.
  28. 2008
  29. Published
    Schueler, J., Fickers, A., & Hommels, A. M. (2008). Bargaining Norms - Arguing Standards. Negotiating Technical Standards. Den Haag: STT Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends.
  30. Published
    Fickers, A., Hommels, A. M., & Schueler, J. (2008). Conclusion. Implications for Research and Policy. In J. A. Schueler, & A. Fickers (Eds.), Norms - Arguing Standards. Negotiating Technical Standards (pp. 144-153). Den Haag: STT Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends.
  31. Published
    Hommels, A. M., Schueler, J., & Fickers, A. (2008). Introduction: The Complexity of Negotiating Standards. In J. A. Schueler, & A. Fickers (Eds.), Bargaining Norms - Arguing Standards. Negotiating Technical Standards (pp. 12-16). Den Haag: STT Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends.
  32. Published
    Hommels, A. M. (2008). Studzing Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technologz Studies and Urban Studies. In R. Fourché (Ed.), Technology Studies. Vol 2.: Theorizing Technological Change (pp. 291-316). London: SAGE.
  33. 2007
  34. Published
  35. Published
  36. Published
  37. Published
  38. 2005
  39. Published
  40. Published
  41. 2004
  42. Published
    Hommels, A. M., van den Hoven, M. J., Nekkers, J. A., & Grotendorst, F. (2004). Even geduld aub! De kwetsbaarheid van de informatievoorziening: oorzaken en gevolgen van verstoringen in de ICT-infrastructuur. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
  43. 2003
  44. Published
  45. Published
  46. Published
  47. Published
  48. 2001
  49. Published
  50. Published
    Hommels, A. M. (2001). Unbuilding Cities. Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change. Maastricht: Datawyse / Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
  51. 2000
  52. Published