You don't know: knowledge as supportive alibi evidence

R. Nieuwkamp*, R. Horselenberg, P. van Koppen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

206 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Until now, supportive evidence for alibis has been conceptualised into two distinct types: witness and physical evidence. The present study examined whether knowledge, as a third type of supportive evidence, can contribute to the understanding of evidence for alibis. Three experiments were conducted in which police detectives, laypersons and undergraduate students were asked to evaluate four alibis with witness, physical or knowledge supportive evidence, or with no supportive evidence. The results from the three experiments show that knowledge evidence is equally believable as strong witness evidence. We also found that not all items of strong physical evidence are evaluated as equally strong and believable. We therefore suggest adjusting the criteria to determine the strength of physical evidence and conducting more research on knowledge evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)695-712
Number of pages18
JournalPsychiatry Psychology and Law
Volume30
Issue number5
Early online date16 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2023

Keywords

  • alibi
  • knowledge
  • police detectives
  • supportive evidence
  • taxonomy
  • GENERATION
  • ERRORS
  • TRUE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'You don't know: knowledge as supportive alibi evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this