Abstract
This article casts light on the moral implications of the possibility of human extinction, with a specific focus on extinction caused by an interruption in human reproduction. In the first two paragraphs, I show that moral philosophy has not yet given promising explanations for the wrongness of this kind of extinction. Specifically, the second paragraph contains a detailed rejection of John Leslie’s main claims on the (im) morality of extinction. In the third paragraph, I offer a demonstration of the fact that a moral view which stresses the permissibility of some types of human extinction can be effectively constructed, while in the following paragraph I propose a prima facie defense of a new approach to the topic which is likely to provide us with reasons in favor of the wrongness of a premature departure of humankind.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1063-1084 |
| Journal | Philosophia |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Would Human Extinction Be Morally Wrong?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver