Women's and Men's Authorship Experiences: A Prospective Meta-Analysis

George C. Banks*, Lisa M. Rasmussen, Scott Tonidandel, Jeffrey M. Pollack, Mary M. Hausfeld, Courtney Williams, Betsy H. Albritton, Joseph A. Allen, Nicolas Bastardoz, John H. Batchelor, Andrew A. Bennett, Roman Briker, Christopher M. Castille, Bart A. De Jong, Elise Demeter, Justin A. Desimone, James G. Field, Maria Figueroa-Armijos, M. Fernanda Garcia, William L. GardnerJ. Jeffrey Gish, Laura M. Giurge, Claudia N. Gonzalez-Brambila, M. Gloria Gonzalez-Morales, Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, Roopak Kumar Gupta, Amanda S. Hinojosa, Zion Howard, Sven Kepes, Tine Kohler, Dejun Tony Kong, Markus Langer, Teng lat Loi, Liam P. Maher, Chao Miao, Murad A. Mithani, Lakshmi Balachandran Nair, William G. Obenauer, Ernest H. O'Boyle, Jason R. Pierce, Deborah M. Powell, Roni Reiter-Palmon, Deborah E. Rupp, Srinivasan Tatachari, Jane S. Thomas, Tiia Vissak, Jako Volschenk, Chen Wang, Christopher E. Whelpley, Hans-Georg Wolff, Et al.

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The opaqueness of author naming and ordering, when coupled with power dynamics, can lead to a number of disadvantages in academic careers. In this commentary, we investigate gender differences in authorship experiences in a large prospective meta-analytic study (k = 46; n = 3,565; 12 countries). We find that women's and men's authorship experiences differ significantly with women reporting greater prevalence of problematic behaviors. We present seven actionable recommendations for improving the receipt and reporting of intellectual credit. Such actions are needed to ensure fairness in authorship, which is one of the most powerful factors in academics' career outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1273-1287
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Management
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Quantitative
  • METHODS
  • Open science (e.g.
  • transparency in research practices)
  • Diversity
  • equity
  • and inclusion
  • MICRO
  • Identity (age
  • disability
  • gender
  • national origin
  • race-ethnicity
  • sexual orientation
  • etc.)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Women's and Men's Authorship Experiences: A Prospective Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this