Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: a European Respiratory Society guideline

J.D. Chalmers, I.F. Laska, F.M.E. Franssen, W. Janssens, I. Pavord, D. Rigau, M.J. McDonnell, N. Roche, D.D. Sin, D. Stolz, S. Suissa, J. Wedzicha, M. Miravitlles*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with bronchodilators can reduce the frequency of exacerbations in some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is evidence, however, that ICS are frequently used in patients where their benefit has not been established. Therefore, there is a need for a personalised approach to the use of ICS in COPD and to consider withdrawal of ICS in patients without a clear indication. This document reports European Respiratory Society recommendations regarding ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD.Comprehensive evidence synthesis was performed to summarise all available evidence relevant to the question: should ICS be withdrawn in patients with COPD? The evidence was appraised using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and the results were summarised in evidence profiles. The evidence synthesis was discussed and recommendations formulated by a committee with expertise in COPD and guideline methodology.After considering the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, quality of evidence, and feasibility and acceptability of interventions, the guideline panel made: 1) conditional recommendation for the withdrawal of ICS in patients with COPD without a history of frequent exacerbations, 2) strong recommendation not to withdraw ICS in patients with blood eosinophil counts.300 eosinophils.mu L-1 and 3) strong recommendation to treat with one or two long-acting bronchodilators if ICS are withdrawn.A conditional recommendation indicates that there was uncertainty about the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of the intervention, and that well-informed patients may make different choices regarding whether to have or not have the specific intervention.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2000351
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • blood eosinophil count
  • double-blind
  • exacerbations
  • fluticasone furoate
  • obstructive pulmonary-disease
  • post-hoc analysis
  • risk
  • salmeterol-fluticasone
  • salmeterol/fluticasone
  • vilanterol
  • VILANTEROL
  • BLOOD EOSINOPHIL COUNT
  • RISK
  • FLUTICASONE FUROATE
  • SALMETEROL-FLUTICASONE
  • SALMETEROL/FLUTICASONE
  • OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE
  • DOUBLE-BLIND
  • EXACERBATIONS
  • POST-HOC ANALYSIS

Cite this