Why study EU foreign policy at all? A response to Keuleers, Fonck, and Keukeleire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

158 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In an important article on the state of EU foreign policy research, Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire show that academics prefer the study of the EU foreign policy system and EU implementation over the consequences of EU foreign policy for recipient countries. While the article is empirical, based on a dataset of 451 published articles on EU foreign policy, the normative message is that it is time to stop with “navel-gazing” and pay more attention to those on the receiving end of EU foreign policy. We welcome this contribution, but wonder why certain research questions have been privileged over others. We argue that this has primarily to do with the predominant puzzles of the time. We also invite Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire to make a theoretical case for a research agenda with more attention for outside-in approaches. We conclude by briefly reflecting on future research agendas in EU foreign policy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280–286
Number of pages7
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • European Union
  • foreign policy
  • research agenda
  • theory
  • NORMATIVE POWER EUROPE
  • INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS
  • CONTRADICTION
  • SERVICE
  • TERMS

Cite this

@article{2a9ee08c932f4afaa67e47a6189726cb,
title = "Why study EU foreign policy at all? A response to Keuleers, Fonck, and Keukeleire",
abstract = "In an important article on the state of EU foreign policy research, Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire show that academics prefer the study of the EU foreign policy system and EU implementation over the consequences of EU foreign policy for recipient countries. While the article is empirical, based on a dataset of 451 published articles on EU foreign policy, the normative message is that it is time to stop with “navel-gazing” and pay more attention to those on the receiving end of EU foreign policy. We welcome this contribution, but wonder why certain research questions have been privileged over others. We argue that this has primarily to do with the predominant puzzles of the time. We also invite Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire to make a theoretical case for a research agenda with more attention for outside-in approaches. We conclude by briefly reflecting on future research agendas in EU foreign policy.",
keywords = "European Union, foreign policy, research agenda, theory, NORMATIVE POWER EUROPE, INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS, CONTRADICTION, SERVICE, TERMS",
author = "Hylke Dijkstra and {Vanhoonacker - Kormoss}, Sophie",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0010836716682393",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "280–286",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Why study EU foreign policy at all? A response to Keuleers, Fonck, and Keukeleire. / Dijkstra, Hylke; Vanhoonacker - Kormoss, Sophie.

In: Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 52, No. 2, 06.2017, p. 280–286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why study EU foreign policy at all? A response to Keuleers, Fonck, and Keukeleire

AU - Dijkstra, Hylke

AU - Vanhoonacker - Kormoss, Sophie

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - In an important article on the state of EU foreign policy research, Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire show that academics prefer the study of the EU foreign policy system and EU implementation over the consequences of EU foreign policy for recipient countries. While the article is empirical, based on a dataset of 451 published articles on EU foreign policy, the normative message is that it is time to stop with “navel-gazing” and pay more attention to those on the receiving end of EU foreign policy. We welcome this contribution, but wonder why certain research questions have been privileged over others. We argue that this has primarily to do with the predominant puzzles of the time. We also invite Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire to make a theoretical case for a research agenda with more attention for outside-in approaches. We conclude by briefly reflecting on future research agendas in EU foreign policy.

AB - In an important article on the state of EU foreign policy research, Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire show that academics prefer the study of the EU foreign policy system and EU implementation over the consequences of EU foreign policy for recipient countries. While the article is empirical, based on a dataset of 451 published articles on EU foreign policy, the normative message is that it is time to stop with “navel-gazing” and pay more attention to those on the receiving end of EU foreign policy. We welcome this contribution, but wonder why certain research questions have been privileged over others. We argue that this has primarily to do with the predominant puzzles of the time. We also invite Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire to make a theoretical case for a research agenda with more attention for outside-in approaches. We conclude by briefly reflecting on future research agendas in EU foreign policy.

KW - European Union

KW - foreign policy

KW - research agenda

KW - theory

KW - NORMATIVE POWER EUROPE

KW - INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS

KW - CONTRADICTION

KW - SERVICE

KW - TERMS

U2 - 10.1177/0010836716682393

DO - 10.1177/0010836716682393

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 280

EP - 286

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 2

ER -